• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Leo Fender did it best....

He got it right here too...
DSC_0010_10.JPG

And at the sharp end...
DSC_0006_15.JPG
 
For my money, a Stingray is my favorite shape. I like that the bridge end is more rounded vs the flattened P Bass. Also, had anyone laid up outlines of a Jazz, P, Stingray and L2000 for comparison? L2000 looks identical to a stingray to my eye
 
  • Like
Reactions: SteveCS
And if you disagree. . . .

I only disagree with the romantic nonsense that Leo did it all himself. He didn't. He had a bunch of people doing lots of stuff the whole time.

Anyone could come up with an idea, if Leo approved then it was in. If he didn't it wasn't, but he didn't do it all by himself! I believe that several others were involved in the Stingray design. Don't know about the G&L basses though.

PS
I do agree that P and J basses are fantastic machines. I've owned a P bass for 48 years. It was the first proper bass I bought and it will be the last one I sell.
 
(Well intentioned) People keep trying to do something different. But, it is pretty amazing how enduring Leo's initial P shape has become for electric bass guitars; especially considering there were VERY few precedents at the time. Folks keep looking for something different; but, most successful templates end up being variations on a theme.
I agree with this 100%. Leo and Fullerton's initial designs (the Tele and 1st Gen P) were slabby and sort of utilitarian, but none the less genius. When Tavares came in and added his professional design skills to the instruments, we ended up with the much more slick P bass, Strat, Jazz Bass, Jazzmaster, Jag, etc...
George and Leo continued to knock it out of the park with Musicman and G&L, though the majority of the tweaks were in the electronics more than body/neck shapes and such. That's testament to the spirit of the OP.
 
I love the Ric body shape, but it was designed to look cool, not be particularly ergonomic. The Strat body is probably the most perfect mass-produced consumer product form factor in existence, based on it's longevity. I can't think how you would improve on it. Many have tried and failed.The P Bass was intended to be a Bass Strat, so to speak, but still doesn't look as graceful as the Jazz bass body, that design is more appealing to me visually.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Gbonus Uralias
(Well intentioned) People keep trying to do something different. But, it is pretty amazing how enduring Leo's initial P shape has become for electric bass guitars; especially considering there were VERY few precedents at the time. Folks keep looking for something different; but, most successful templates end up being variations on a theme.

Thanks and you summed up my feelings behind the original post quite nicely.
Especially being that there was nothing proceeding these, for the designers to reverse engineer, other than traditional uprights for the most part.

To all, Please bring forth your unique Bass(es) from other designers.
Bring them into the light to shine!

Peace, Love and good happiness stuff to all.
 
In my humble opinion I feel that the jazz and precision body shapes that Leo Fender whittled and honed him self, are by far the most sexy and perfect shapes for the bass guitar - the Strat too body
He just hit it out of the park with those perfect curves and perfect length horns and double cut away, and headstock shape, pick guard shapes accenting the body....NAILED IT!!

And with all the different brands and models made since then, everything has fallen short (ok "fallen short" might be too harsh)....some to the point that they just give up on there own design and get in line and directly copy Leo like all the other's.

The only other body style on that pedestal is the Les Paul....respect due there too.

Just had to blurt my appreciation umungst peers.
My wife and kids don't give two sh!ts one way or the other ;-)

And if you disagree, who/what is your favorite body shape?

I totally agree with all this. I love Fender designs and style. The headstock gets me every single time. It's like if I ever lay eyes on a Fender headstock, it immediately inspires me to play.

My only gripe with them, and this very well may be the only one, is the bottom cut away. I wish it was recessed more and cut out to make it easier to get as high as possible way up the neck. Not a deal breaker, but it would be nice. And the stock bridges (the older style simple ones) have never been my favorite. I own 4 different Squier/Fender basses and I have changed the bridge out on all of them. Not that those older bridges don’t work, because they do. I just hate the way they look. But that’s all aesthetic.
 
I agree on the Strat body. It's one of the best feeling and most comfortable solid body electrics ever. And I agree, over the decades Leo got more refined with his innovations. He was a good electrical engineer that didn't play instruments, but he listened to good players and got feedback from which he created.

Although he was a innovative creator, his last creations are very old. And many new innovations have come to light. Though they may not be ground breaking or as well known as what Leo did, they do build off on what exists, and are essential for the development of music.
 
While we are tossing opinions out there.... I can't stand the pick guards. Just a cosmetic to cover up poor routing and it can hide good wood. Truss rod adjustments screw still being located under the pick guard on some models, ***. 3 bolt necks with a tilt screw, I'm not buying that either. I'm not saying they're junk, I'm just saying. Modern G&L's are my first choice for a bass that Leo had anything to do with.

However, tastefully done larger pickguards to cover skillfully done larger body routes could have knocked some weight off.