• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Less is More Masters

I have bassist that come to mind as Masters of the less is more style of playing bass. They have perfected the use of creating and leaving space between the notes in such a way that it actually highlights the song. They groove so hard on such few notes.

Paul S Denman of Sade
Tina Weymouth ( Talking Heads, Tom Tom Club)
Joseph Lucky Scott ( Curtis Mayfield)
Bootsy
Sting

Can you think of any others?
Nothing to do with the thread but once I worked for a guy named Les Moore. He was an idiot.
 
Sounds like you're jealous. You probably don't think much of Ron Blair, either. Billy Talbot, or Bill Wyman for that matter? When was shredding(or as I call it, wanking)bass any yardstick for anything? That just smacks of the all the haughty fusion muso bores I've encountered in my life. An impressive bassist holds back, does their job, and when they throw in something flash on occasion, that carries more weight than non-stop diddley-diddley, otherwise, it just gets as tiresome as riding the root might be.
I'm not that much of a fan, but U2's entire oeuvre was minimalism; would Jaco, or worse yet, Jeff Berlin, have fit that situation? As far as Burrell is concened, while even though he had played guitar before, got off to a shakey start in King Crimson, and learned on the job, his BC lines always caught my ear, even after they jumped the shark for me on the second album. Then I find out years later that he was playing fretless before fretless was cool. What would Claypool or Entwistle have added to that band? Or any of the bands that feature bassist that always get taken to task for being dull?
As far as I can tell, Michael Anthony hasn't been mentioned yet, that's surprising. As for Waters, how did PF suffer from his playing? What else would have worked on "Careful With That Axe, Eugene"?


Clayton's work on "Stay (far away, so close)" is a masterpiece in holding back.

Another great, and more varied example is "The Fly", where he vamps his way through the verse, lays down the essential framework for the chorus, and then winds it up with an absolutely killer riff on the post-chorus bridge.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Dasgre0g
Nothing to do with the thread but once I worked for a guy named Les Moore. He was an idiot.



My brother Les used to run around with a guy named Les Moore in the 70's. Les Moore was 6ft 2 and about 350 lbs and my bro was 6ft 6 and around 270. In a town of less than 3,000.




They became known as Les Moore and Less Les.
 
Playing at the edge of your ability is not synonymous with mastery

In several cases "best they can do" is being interpreted as "intentionally good at crafting things in a minimalist way".

Can't be a master of less is more, unless you can feasibly do the more part.

All these statements are wrong. You most certainly can be a master of part of a skill, and this is a fact IMO. Case in point would be Ian Hill & Cliff Williams. They are most definitely masters of what they play & quite frankly this would be almost impossible to say otherwise. They have that aspect of bass playing down pat! So whether they can slap is irrelevent to the level of the aforementioned skill.
 
All these statements are wrong. You most certainly can be a master of part of a skill, and this is a fact IMO. Case in point would be Ian Hill & Cliff Williams. They are most definitely masters of what they play & quite frankly this would be almost impossible to say otherwise. They have that aspect of bass playing down pat! So whether they can slap is irrelevent to the level of the aforementioned skill.

Thats not equivalent to being "master of more is less".

That statement implies that one intentionally underplays. Despite an extreme level of playing ability.

Like Pino, or Anthony Jackson.

Yes. Cliff Williams is quite good at pedaling 8ths. But it would be odd to imply he is a master at a less is more approach to bass. He's a good rock bassist. Anything beyond that is hyperbole.
 
Last edited:
The 80s was (luckily) not a less is more period for bass. It was the pinnacle for bass playing in popular music. So I am glad Pino did not yet discover a less is more approach back then.
I see it quite differently - I strongly dislike a lot of the 80s stuff , as goes for the busier stuff Pino did back then(the Paul young video linked above is a good example...I find it hard to get through), but who wants to argue about taste...

I do agree that some interesting things came out of the 80s in terms of bass in popular music, but would not say that they were any more or less interesting than what came before or after. I just tend to like them less. :)
 
My brother Les used to run around with a guy named Les Moore in the 70's. Les Moore was 6ft 2 and about 350 lbs and my bro was 6ft 6 and around 270. In a town of less than 3,000.




They became known as Les Moore and Less Les.

LOL

Reminds me of two Italian boys at my school back in the 1970s. Good kids. Both were in my younger sister's class, and while unrelated, had the same name i.e. Vincenzo Pedulla. One was thin like a whip, while the other was quite plump (quite unusual to see a plump kid in Australia back then). To avoid confusion, we called them fat Vince and skinny Vince.

Back to thread.