TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
Yea the big ol' ROCKBASS on the head is a bit obnoxious, the Warwick W does look a lot sleaker.
Maybe a new pre-amp, a nice new set of strings, and a pro set-up and any Rockbass would be good to go...
Except for the big stupid RockBass on the headstock. Bad enough fighting people's perceptions of 'expected' basses for gigs without the word ROCK on the headstock.
Just seems like a very limiting choice by Warwick.
Unfortunately I have to agree with Baird6869. I have the same model, and I am not too happy about it. Since I did not know if fretless was "my thing" I bought a well known brand, but a cheap instrument (to minimize losses in case of a sale.)
Mine is a 2003 active Corvette in blue - at least it looks good!
Tone and volume is very uneven across the neck/strings, preamp is really noisy, there is a dead spot between D and F on the G-string, strap knob threads on the horn are not OK. etc.![]()
Biggest problem is that I can not find a tone I like from this thing. (And no, it is not ONLY skill that is missing...)
And the output is much lower than what I get from my passive SDs in my P-bass.
However, the neck is nice, I like the body contour and balance, so I do not mind playing it.
Is there any way to make a "player" out of this one, or should I bite the bullet and trade it for a better instrument?
/Alexander