• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Linear vs audio taper whats the difference?

I need to replace the direct out pot on my amp and its labeled as c10k from alpha, ive tried searching and could only find is the Alpha Pot 10k linear and audio taper pots, which one is the right one, or what is the difference?
 
In linear taper pots, the change in output as you move the pot linearly from center indent to the max in either direction is "linear" (Yeah, it's a crappy definition), as compared with an audio pot wherein as you move the pot linearly from center indent to max in either direction, the change in output is small the closer you are to center indent and larger as you reach the max position in either direction. I think the term here is it follows a logarithmic pattern (remember your maths?).
 
Audio = logarithmic, yes. The response is like an arc instead of a straight line, so that there is a wider usable range in the middle of the pot turn. Most audio controls are designed around an "optimal" range of effect on the signal, so it helps to have more control around that optimal range and less at the extremes.
 
Actuallly, it is more related to the human perception of loudness. When the level increase in a linear manner, human ear hears it as a derivation of a third degree curve. In other words, the perceived loudness is not linear, it is more like an S curve (it slowly increases and then suddenly a giant increase in 1/4 of the rotation of the pot).

this actually applies to the volume controls. In other type of controls, linear is always the safe bet unless known otherwise. For example, audio taper pots do not work very well in the feedback loop of the opamps and the perceived gain increase is less natural compared to audio taper pots.

In your case, what you are holding is a *reverse* log pot ( "c" stands for reverse logarithmic / reverse audio taper). If they put a reverse log pot there, they certainly had a very good reason. I would suggest try to find a reverse log taper pot, which I am 99% positive mouser have. Check the 24mm alpha pots.
 
They arent tooooo rare. But hard enough (it is reverse log pots for volume on left handed guitars an basses is it not?).

I remember spending an age looking for them, it is possible to use a regular log pot and it just works backwards or something. Im sure there was a way around it, but i cant remember off the top of my head.

Maybe best contacting a local tech or the company who make the amp for the parts
 
I remember spending an age looking for them, it is possible to use a regular log pot and it just works backwards or something. Im sure there was a way around it, but i cant remember off the top of my head.
Well, sort of... if you want full volume to be fully anti-clockwise, then sure you can do that, but most of us are trained to think the other way!

One way to bodge pots is to install resistors in parallel. All the important stuff is right here.
 
Hey guys!
I m not sure i understand it all but i have a question:
I got a lefty G&L L1500 a couple of weeks ago(great bass!!!) but something bothers me with the electronics. The active part is busted so i exclusively run it in passive mode: The bass cut is way too strong on the first like 15% and from there it makes no difference. It also takes a lot of volume.
The treble cut is the opposite , i have to turn it almost all the way off to hear some change. It makes it tricky when you play live .... I showed it to a tech in Paris that told me it might be because those pots are right handed audio ones wired left hand way.
Can that be true?
On my Alembic Epic two out of 4 pots work right handed way , is that why?
Should i try to find left handed ones or can i just rewire them right handed way and get used to that? Or is it all wrong and something else is f****d in my bass?
Thanks
 
attachment.gif