This is close enough for me...
Last edited:
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
This guy forgot to put the water in his.
I can't imagine the weight increase. I wouldn't do it. YMMV
Which liquid is best for metal?
(had to)
bat urine, of course.
Did that start life as a reverend slingshot?
Might be interesting to include a good drainage valve so that you can replace the fluid to change your tone.
Mercury for heavy metal, water/oil for blues/jazz etc, helium for funk.
Same thingDon't look now but I think you've discovered the secret to the T-40
If by 'bat urine' you mean bud light, then +1
I'm pretty sure the liquid would serve to damp vibrations significantly. Ordinarily I'd say the body won't influence tone much but this is different. Unless there are no air bubbles and the shell is extremely rigid (it won't be) this construction will yield a dull tone with no sustain.the fluid would make no difference,it's all in the pickups and bridge. The inside of the body does zilch zero nada.
I'm pretty sure the liquid would serve to damp vibrations significantly. Ordinarily I'd say the body won't influence tone much but this is different. Unless there are no air bubbles and the shell is extremely rigid (it won't be) this construction will yield a dull tone with no sustain.
If it's a water balloon, yes. If it's simply one of any number of woods, not so much. : DSo the body does influence tone much?
I'm pretty sure the liquid would serve to damp vibrations significantly. Ordinarily I'd say the body won't influence tone much but this is different. Unless there are no air bubbles and the shell is extremely rigid (it won't be) this construction will yield a dull tone with no sustain.
Mercury... No, no, ... Heavy Water with a touch of Uranium.