• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Looks over tone?

Sacrifice tone for looks?

  • Guilty

    Votes: 54 29.3%
  • Not guilty

    Votes: 130 70.7%

  • Total voters
    184
Both looks and tone take a distant back seat to ergonomics. If it doesn't play well, then I don't care about anything else.

Tone can usually be fixed with a string/pickup or maybe preamp swap within reason (a p sounds like a p, a j sounds like a j). Looks... meh. Very low on my radar.

Edit, by playability I am NOT talking about setup. Some basses just want to fight me on playing them. Those are firewood as far as I'm concerned.
 
But... Inlays!

Agree. Inlays can look so sweet on some basses and color combinations. Since this is a thread about looks vs tone, if all you are missing are inlays and you have your tone, I would suggest inlay decals. You can get them from a seller Jockomo in Japan on ebay. items in Guitar Bass Fret Marker Inlay Sticker Decal Rod Cover Custom store on eBay!

I've used them and they actually look pretty good, feel fine and seem to wear well. I put them on a Squier VM and my band mates could not tell they were decals vs. actual inlays on neck. If you have an expensive or vintage bass you may not want to use the decals. Not sure what the long term effects would be on the fretboard. I took the decals off after about 2 years (was swapping to other neck) and decals came off and the neck looked fine after decals removal. However, YMMV.
 
Good point. A high C would be good with that 15 fret neck, though. (You can see why they thought it might work.)

A high C is even better with a regular neck. And a body that balances well. And pickups in places that sound good.

But yeah, I understand the logic behind it. Upright players had been doing the same thing for years when Fender tried it on electric.
 
Number one priority, for me, is "feel"/playability. My first bass I bought was an MTD and I bought it because it just felt "right". Later on, I leaned towards tone as my number one consideration. Since then, I've come back to playability as my number one priority because I can always have the pickups and/or preamp changed. Plus, modern amps allow such a wide range of tonal shaping that you can always "sound" like you want to.
 
I hate to say this, but I do it more often than I might like to admit. My 2008 American Standard P-bass has never let me down and does get played at least once a show (if not entire shows), but it gets subbed out for basses I like because they are cool, or, *owch* look good. My stable has Gibson T-bird, a Ric 4003, a Geddy Jazz and a Steinberger. They all sneak out with me to shows from time to time, get played and then ultimately replaced within a set or two by my ole reliable US P.
I'm in the same boat. I have a wonderful G&L L-2000 that is more versatile than any bass I've ever owned, but the American Standard P bass I bought has "it". The charm, the sounds, the looks - I love it.

I recently was hit by a GAS attack and thought of trading my P for a US Deluxe J bass (oly white/maple fretboard/block inlays), but remembered I was never totally cool with the J sound and that the entire reason I switched to the P was for it's own specific tone.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Fletz