• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Loud Rock with 2x12 cab?

Right there are a couple of long excursion 12" PA drivers with 3" VC (or even bigger diameter) available which can come close to the fridge with even less than half the size of the cabinet. The drawback will be lots of more power to get the same SPL and also the need to support the midrange by smallish cone or something else. Another drawback might be a less colorful voicing versus full range running OEM MI drivers. As usual there is no free lunch.
Power is very cheap and light these days, and EQ is easy.
Nothing I have read about the "super cabs" sounds like they don't deliver the lows.
 
Power is very cheap and light these days, and EQ is easy.
Nothing I have read about the "super cabs" sounds like they don't deliver the lows.
Right, power is cheap these days but, not every coloring can be EQ'd. Some OEM MI drivers provide a rich coloring at overload range which can't be EQ'd with any amplifier. For example it's impossible to emulate the voicing of a EVM 12L with EQ.

There is no doubt about it that "super cabs" provide more of low end than "coloring" average MI cabs.
In practice my 212 cab which is loaded with pretty superb 3" VC drivers needs about >1kW power to compete with Marshall stacks. Either way in every "similar" case I'd bring the fridge instead cause the 810 knocks off more beaf to lunch at same loudness level.

The term "Loud rock" may mean anything.
The OP might also swap his 410 for two Acme 210 cabs just to get the desired low end extension.
I have got no idea if his existing amp was then powerful enough to stay well in the mix of a loud rock band. I have got no idea how loud his band actually is playing at rehearsal and on stage.
Also I have got no idea if then he may want wish back the voicing of his existing cab.

As usual there is no free lunch but bundles of trade offs.
 
Last edited:
Oh I'd really love to think about a 2x12" it seems like exactly what I want aswell...but will I ever be entirely happy with it? I was entirely happy with my mesa 6x10 and the berg 6x10 has been inspiring some gas of late. Not for all but I really love the tilt and roll of a 6x10. So my vote is for the NV610T and be happy and keep these full stack screechers in check lol. Best of luck.
I have a Barefaced 6x10 that rolls and only weighs 69 pounds. Expensive, but worth it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: shoot-r
I keep trying to use smaller cabs, but keep coming back to my Ampeg 6X10... even for quieter gigs with the upright playing jazz...just sounds better than my other cabinets. I would think 2X12 sould be ok with PA support as stated though I usually go for 4X10 at least for rock gigs which is probably just preference.


9 times out of 10 - when I have to haul a cabinet and head around - I go with the 6X10 as well. I LOVE the tone from the SVT4Pro with the 6X10.....or, when I REALLY don't want to lug the road case with the 4Pro in it - I take the V4B - sounds GREAT as well....Hell, even when we had great FOH support, I still dug listening to the 6X10. It is a FINE cabinet!
 
  • Like
Reactions: Josh Kneisel
I used my 2x12 cab (custom built) last weekend for the first time alone, normally I use it in combo with my (custom built) 2x10 cab. It's built with 2 Emience Definimax 12s and although I prefer the sound of both cabs run together the 2x12 alone pulled off the show and I had some nice compliments about my sound. It was a relatively small venue.
Classic and modern rock band. Ampeg preamps and QSC 3002 power amp.
 
When I want to rock hard with a 212, the Mesa PH 212 (or two of them) is my first choice. The Berg CN212 is excellent cab with a lot of volume if you want it, but almost feels too sophisticated/polite for hard rock. Two GK Neo 112 II's are pretty impressive and have a an edgy rock voice as well.
 
Many players have much success using just two 12" drivers.
I've proven to "not" be one of those players.
I've tried and tried over the past 40+ years to downsize to two 12's in many different styles of bands in many different settings....it's "never" worked for my ears.
The absolute minimum of drivers for me is 4-10's, (two, 210 cabinets stacked as a vertical 410), and a lot of the time I'm wishing for more 10's, and that's with FOH!

Borrow, rent, ect., a 212 cabinet to try with a live band before buying, it may prove to your ears to not be your thing for a rock setting....
+1

I use two MB 2x10's (102 HF) stacked vertically, on a little platform thingy that takes it a couple of inches off the stage with a MB 500 watt valve head.

I use this for all gigs, small, middle size and biggies. Small footprint and lovely tone. When one sustains a low note it just swells and hangs with this rig, smaller ones just fade away. Also I know just how to set up the rig at the gig without compromising.

Tried using just one cab at smaller gigs and just didn't cut it. It's not a loudness thing at all, this rig will go crazy loud, it's all about the tone.
 
+1

I use two MB 2x10's (102 HF) stacked vertically, on a little platform thingy that takes it a couple of inches off the stage with a MB 500 watt valve head.

I use this for all gigs, small, middle size and biggies. Small footprint and lovely tone. When one sustains a low note it just swells and hangs with this rig, smaller ones just fade away. Also I know just how to set up the rig at the gig without compromising.

Tried using just one cab at smaller gigs and just didn't cut it. It's not a loudness thing at all, this rig will go crazy loud, it's all about the tone.



+1 on vertical stacking two 210 cabinets.

I started doing the two 210 vertical thing roughfully 10 years ago.

With the vertical stacking's advantages over the standard configured 410 cabinet, my ears won't let me do it any other way now!
 
In my secondary band, I play Metal covers (Black Sabbath to Metallica to Wasp) with a guitar player who loves his 100 W Marshall tube rig and 4x12 cab, and keep up just fine with a stack of two Orange 112 neo cabs and a 500 W Terror Bass head. But: the drummer knows how to play with restraint, and the guitar player has in-ears and mics his cab rather than blasting all over the stage. So, in short: it depends on your band mates whether 212 is enough, or not.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Rocknroller4
Just saw on another T.B. thread that Mesa (my fave head manufacturer) will soon be releasing a Subway 212 cabinet.

I'll be checking out their version of the 212 format when/if I ever run across one.

But, odds are, I'll be gigging with my vertical 410 for many years to come....





(An update about my post from 2017.)

Roughfully 3-1/2 weeks ago I parked my vertical 410 and have started gigging a Bergantino CN212.
(A cab that's been mentioned in this thread many times.)

HUGELY impressed with the CN212 as a stand-alone cab in the 5 pcs., moderately loud, country/rock band I'm with.
 
Ran a 212 with a loud two guitar hard rock band for about 3-4 years. Had a second 212 cab but only brought it to a handful of gigs. Second cab was serious overkill on all but a no PA support outdoor gig.

So yeah, from my exp a single 212 has no problems handling rehearsals and stage monitor duties on PA support indoor gigs.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Rocknroller4
Agreed on all fronts.

Except, depending on the maker (Greenboy, Barefaced, LDS, etc), the 212 will actually be significantly louder than a commercial 410.

I don't have any experience with the CN212, but the LDS 15/6 I use absolutely buries any 410 I've ever owned or played through, including Aguilar, Ampeg, GK, Avatar, Mesa, Hartke, Carvin...I think that's it ;)

Jim at Bergantino makes great stuff, unless the band is stupid loud or you're trying to carry a large room without PA support I'd imagine it'd work great.

What is the LDS 15/6 ?