TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
I'll throw my hat into the ring.
The sound argument? Maple/brighter, Rosewood/darker? Well, Rosewood is a lot harder than Maple. A lot. So in theory Rosewood should have a brighter sound than Maple, but most folks say they hear the opposite. I think they are hallucinating, and personally I cannot tell the difference.
I like the feel of Rosewood a little better.
Rosewood and Maple expand and contract at different rates with humidity changes. In my experience this makes all Maple necks more stable, requiring less truss rod adjustments.
I'll throw my hat into the ring.
The sound argument? Maple/brighter, Rosewood/darker? Well, Rosewood is a lot harder than Maple. A lot. So in theory Rosewood should have a brighter sound than Maple, but most folks say they hear the opposite. I think they are hallucinating, and personally I cannot tell the difference.
I like the feel of Rosewood a little better.
Rosewood and Maple expand and contract at different rates with humidity changes. In my experience this makes all Maple necks more stable, requiring less truss rod adjustments.
I'll throw my hat into the ring.
The sound argument? Maple/brighter, Rosewood/darker? Well, Rosewood is a lot harder than Maple. A lot. So in theory Rosewood should have a brighter sound than Maple, but most folks say they hear the opposite. I think they are hallucinating, and personally I cannot tell the difference.
I like the feel of Rosewood a little better.
Rosewood and Maple expand and contract at different rates with humidity changes. In my experience this makes all Maple necks more stable, requiring less truss rod adjustments.