i knew someone was going to say that... here ya go.
![]()
Nice Pic, nice gear.

TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
i knew someone was going to say that... here ya go.
![]()

I was thinking the same thing - maybe a stereo head with two of the 500 watt power sections that could be bridged mono... or I'm sure they could figure out how to build a more powerful version of the current 500 watt. The whole line is small and light enough that a few pounds more wouldn't make a difference IMO - the R500 is one of their biggest and heaviest amps, and it's still so small and light.... I think we've reached a point of diminishing returns with the whole small/light thing.
JR


Nice review!
I played the R500 at the 2006 Winter NAMM, and at the time, it was my favorite sounding of the Markbass heads I tried (and I tried them all).
I was recently able to gig with the Classic 300 (which will be reviewed in issue #2 of BGM), and it was a really awesome experience. I'd love to take the R500 for a spin, too, but like you guys, I am watching for the R800 and the MoMark.
Tom
hey JGR,
thanks for all the info. how does the R500 sound with the NV610 vs. the NV215? I'm so torn between those two cabs...
Also, can you get a decent clean sound out of the amp? I generally prefer some dirt, but need to clean once and a while.
justin
I'd be interested in hearing how the R500 sounds with an Epifani PS115 and 112 stack.
I'm jonesing for a tube pre right now, and have thought about the GK Fusion, but the 20lbs weight difference is difficult to overlook.
Ljazz