TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
That sounds about right, could ce a little quicker depending on how shipping tone and delays affect the container ship industry.I searched all over but cant find a store that is selling a WD-800 in Europe, anybody has any information? I read somewhere that it will be available again in Europe in October, but there is no possibility to get it before that date? Thanks!
Thank you. I have one more n00b question. If my friend brought me amp from US, he is business travelling in Las vegas currently, would it work on the european electricity network or would i need some special converters too? Is it even available in some store near Las Vegas? Thank you!That sounds about right, could ce a little quicker depending on how shipping tone and delays affect the container ship industry.
Thank you. I have one more n00b question. If my friend brought me amp from US, he is business travelling in Las vegas currently, would it work on the european electricity network or would i need some special converters too? Is it even available in some store near Las Vegas? Thank you!



Once again I find myself really appreciating the depth of your experience in this field, your knowledge, and willingness to share with those willing to listen. Thank you.The Q’s are pretty similar but the manufacturing tolerances in the controls can result in a lack of precision if the relative centers. This is always a challenge with variable frequency designs, has been for as long as I have been designing filter circuits. Custom trimmed controls Conan be used, but the cost skyrockets.
As a approximate starting point I'm pretty sure the manual indicates that the semiparametric frequency controls affect roughly a 1/3 of an octave on each side of the center frequency selected...it's been a while since I looked at it, but I seem to recall that information was included in the narrative (not in the spec table at the end).The Q’s are pretty similar but the manufacturing tolerances in the controls can result in a lack of precision if the relative centers. This is always a challenge with variable frequency designs, has been for as long as I have been designing filter circuits. Custom trimmed controls Conan be used, but the cost skyrockets.
Because of the logarithmic nature of RC frequency controls, a small deviation in tolerance can appear to be greater than it is when the inverse log is taken of the impacted value.
Because reverse log pots are used in the frequency controls, the manufacturing process of these are particularly prone to tolerance challenges. Where dual controls are used (as they are in these circuits), it’s even more challenging because there are now superimposed “relative tolerances” too. Fortunately, in practice this is not nearly as bad as the math might suggest.
No, the problem is likely to be magneto reluctance. It needs one of these:Because of the logarithmic nature of RC frequency controls, a small deviation in tolerance can appear to be greater than it is when the inverse log is taken of the impacted value.
Because reverse log pots are used in the frequency controls, the manufacturing process of these are particularly prone to tolerance challenges. Where dual controls are used (as they are in these circuits), it’s even more challenging because there are now superimposed “relative tolerances” too. Fortunately, in practice this is not nearly as bad as the math might suggest.
It’s a very mild cab sim, based on the Subway 115 which is very close to FRFR. This is primarily in post mode too.Got a question for you guys/gals. On the Mesa/Boggie website, under "amp features", it mentions that the WD-800 has a "cabinet simulation direct live recording output". Does that mean there is a bult in cab sim of some sort?
That makes some sense. I have been raving about the FRFR nature of the WD/SW 115 combination. But before I got the cabinet I had the head and had use it for recording in post mode a lot. When I got my SW 115 it was like huh? This sounds a bit like the amp did on it own. It was like the DI signal out loud through the speaker. Does that make any sense?It’s a very mild cab sim, based on the Subway 115 which is very close to FRFR. This is primarily in post mode too.
It’s a very mild cab sim, based on the Subway 115 which is very close to FRFR. This is primarily in post mode too.
It’s similar to the Subway 115 with the tweeter control at 12:00. I wouldn’t suggest that it would be ideal with distortion and fuzz, unless there’s a low pass filter on the distorted signal path.Thanks for the reply. Is there any high frequency roll off? I'm just wondering if it is enough of a sim to take the buzz out of outboard fuzz pedals and distortions when using the DI to FOH? I guess I'll know myself in a few days. I just ordered one.
These kids and their distortion.It’s similar to the Subway 115 with the tweeter control at 12:00. I wouldn’t suggest that it would be ideal with distortion and fuzz, unless there’s a low pass filter on the distorted signal path.
Wow, that's (one kind of) holy grail.It was like the DI signal out loud through the speaker.
If you are talking about the Subway 215, there is a very small ~1dB bump centered around 60Hz… extremely mild by any standard.Wow, that's (one kind of) holy grail.
*
I guess the 215 has a bump before it starts rolling off the lows. Could someone tell me approximately the frequency and amplitude of that bump?
Thank you.