TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
We've looked at the set up your drummer has, but have not gone that way.
We use
3 mics on a 6 piece kit w/ 6 cymbals.
1 on the kick.
1 on under the snare and hi hat, kinda inbetween.
1 ambience mic overhead for the toms and cymbals.
Works fine, we gig about 7 times a month FYI.
+1 to gating. ive also been a huge fan of cutting the bottom end off of things that dont need it. they seem to make floor toms sound like kicks and kicks sound like nuclear fallout. theres no reason why a floor tom needs to go below 100hz.
depending on the size of the place, you often dont need to mic overheads, and if you do, most people are leaning towards under-cymbal clip mics. im not sure how they mix them, but i see a lot of them.
often clip on tom and snare mics. 2 kicks (in and out), and rarely if ever mic a hi-hat.
57's wont make great overheads. they might make mediocre cymbal spot mics.. but i wouldnt try to pick up the kit with them.
Folmeister, I don't know if I've asked you this before, but is that Rev. Bob Dobbs of the Church of the Subgenius in your avatar?
57's aren't the worst mics you can use for OH's, but most sound companies use condenser mics because they aren't as directional and are better at picking up sounds from farther away. 57's make excellent snare mics, though.
Some sound companies stick rigidly by the thin condensers with small diaphragms in the mistaken belief that they're only picking up cymbals (that may be the intention, but they get the whole kit and sound weak on the drums IMHO), but if you're trying to pick up a whole kit, you're better off getting a large diaphragm condenser because it'll have a beefier low end. I'm not really up on condenser mics these days, but several companies make good affordable ones. Might want to go on some drum sites and get opinions.
57's are great snare mics, except they are too fragile, and get the caps knocked off too easy.
I don't mind ring, but when it's so loud it tends toward feedback or makes the whole tone unpleasant it's a hair-puller!
Can someone give me some good recommendations on good overhead mics? I don't want to break the bank at Monte Carlo, but if I can get past the "use 57s for everything" stage it would be a good investment.
It's a give and take like many other things. String height issues have to satisfy ease to play but also how the string can vibrate and sound on the other end. You can't give to Peter without taking from Paul. Drum ring is natural and good. Too much ring and it moves into technical problem territory. Back it off from there and find what works. It's tricky and time consuming, but it has to be done. If the resonating causes feedback just try to deal with that first. Have you gone over the monitoring? Does it still over-resonate with all the monitors off? It might be solved by changing the monitoring. Take drums out of the monitors, move his monitors, etc, one by one and something may suddenly stop being objectionable.
A good investment? I'd be getting the insane monitor-addicted drummer to pony up for drum mics, stands, and a powered 15" monitor.
are you high?
the 57 is the single toughest mic to ever be mass produced. so what if the top bit breaks.. it still works. the only time ive EVER heard about someone destroying a 57 is when he tried to record f16 take offs and put one a few feet from the burner. he melted it.
ive never seen a used 421 that didnt have stick dents in it from sloppy drummers who nail them on tom rolls. but they still work.
dynamic mics by definition are pretty tough. any mic made half well can take a beating. and if you have drummers knocking them off stuff, you need better drummers or lower profile mics, and im pretty sure shure makes a smaller 57.
