i use a 906 because i like it better and its more low profile, but ive NEVER seen anyone have that problem with 57's before. im pretty sure they would still function, but a few shots right on the capsule and it might be done fer.
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
Hi, gang! We did another gig last night and I decided that we would only do the kick and two area mics. I was getting really frustrated because we had this low-end bloom/feedback that I could not find. I knew it was tied to the kick mic, but as I was adjusting while playing it was almost impossible to deal with without really screwing up my parts. The lead singer found it. The mic stand for the kick was vibrating. This was truly bizarre. We use one of those Shure bullet-looking mics and the entire stand was building this vibrational throb from the monitors. What a pain!
The mic stand for the kick was vibrating. This was truly bizarre. We use one of those Shure bullet-looking mics and the entire stand was building this vibrational throb from the monitors. What a pain!
We've looked at the set up your drummer has, but have not gone that way.
We use
3 mics on a 6 piece kit w/ 6 cymbals.
1 on the kick.
1 on under the snare and hi hat, kinda inbetween.
1 ambience mic overhead for the toms and cymbals.
Works fine, we gig about 7 times a month FYI.
well, not exactly. it happens all the time...
B52´s have notorious low-end boost, very prone to feed back, and with high stage volume it gets worse... it helps to have the rubber "feet" of the stand intact, and the stand on carpet. maybe raise your cabs off the stage... gating the kick channel would help somewhat, too...