• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

mim bridge vs squier affinity bridge?

hey guys, I've looked around for this andwer and haven't found anything. Anyways, I've been wondering if there's a big difference between the bridges found on mim basses and squier affinity basses. I'm trying to keep my squier jazz as stock-looking as possible and don't want to spend a whole lot of money on the bridge, so would it be worth it to upgrade from the stock bridge to one off of a standard mim? Thanks guys!
 
I've got an Affinity Jazz V and I love the bass, but absolutely hated that bridge. The saddles leaned to the left, and it scratched the plating on the bridge floorplate when adjusting the intonation.

I replaced it and am a whole lot happier. Just be prepared to redrill, because the hole pattern is different that anything else I found.

Here's what I used, and I'm very happy with the results: Invalid Link Removed

This bridge is also used on Carvin 5000s, and Brubaker Brutes.

Bob
 
FYI:::

There are two Affinity 4-string bridges.

Some are wide, heavy and too big to fit under a bridge cover.

Others will fit, are thinner, less tall and less wide and will fit OK.

I have one of the fat-tall-wide ones and it will not accept the cover - but you are interested in the grooves that align the bridge adjusters - right?

100_7523.jpg


100_7524.jpg


This one is almost 3.4" wide - just thought you'd like to know - and I have not seen another Affinity P-bass with a bridge this wide.
 
I am seeing some misinformation.

MIM standards dont have threaded saddles , the 50s classic , 60s classic jazz and roadworns do. The standard MIM bridge is pretty much identical to an affinity , there maybe cheaper metal used but overall your not going to notice a difference.

The vintage threaded saddle type bridge , is nice i like em alot and a worthy upgrade.
 
I have a somewhat limited number of Fender/Squiers of era: 1998-2010, but none of them have had bad Allen screws nor what I have seen as the propensity to unscrew themselves and drop the bridge barrels at all.

I like the design of the Affinity with the set screw grooves at the base of the bridge plate (the long side of the angle iron, so hated by some persons) - but seriously I don't rip on my strings hard enough to need them for alignment on anything I own.
 
The thread pitch and diameter were ok. It was the hex head that was really soft, and eventualy rounded.

A bit off topic, but I heard from somewhere (on a forum) that the later decade '04-09 Fenders lacked quality. Just a subjective observation on who ever made the statement. I myself don't have enough experience with this decades Fender's to judge.
 
Surferjoe, you have a real unique affinity , i have had 3 , currently still own one, 50$ craigslist find and a damn good bass, never seen one like yours in person. A rarebird indeed/


Loinmute- Most people agree that from about 2007 and up fender has been improving in quality , i can see people bashing around the 04 mark due to S1 switching but fender and fender brands like squier have really gone up in quality recently , its amazing to see the difference.
 
Surferjoe, you have a real unique affinity , i have had 3 , currently still own one, 50$ craigslist find and a damn good bass, never seen one like yours in person. A rarebird indeed/


Loinmute- Most people agree that from about 2007 and up fender has been improving in quality , i can see people bashing around the 04 mark due to S1 switching but fender and fender brands like squier have really gone up in quality recently , its amazing to see the difference.

The bridge is unique and very stable, but it's the neck that makes this bass sing. The pots are original too and for some that is unfathomable and goes counter to what should be expected for such an inexpensive guitar.