• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Mitchell MB100- budget shorty (NBD and Review)

I was in the market for an inexpensive short scale. Saw this and thought I’d roll the dice; figured I could fix anything small and return if issues were major. They’re listed for $180 but MF had them on sale for $140. I believe Mitchell is a GC house brand.
Mitchell MB100 Short-Scale Solid-Body Electric Bass Guitar

IMG_6288.jpeg


Setup:
Out of the box action was very high. Like 4mm or more. Neck screws were loose so I had to straighten the neck and screw those down. I thought I’d have to shim (and still might) but after adjusting the truss rod, I can get just-under Fender specs. Bridge saddles are low now, but not bottomed out. Nut is cut surprisingly well. Only a few tweaks to intonation. Definitely playable!

Neck:
Back of neck finish is fantastic, high point of this instrument. Better than many Squiers in the sub-$300 range, smooth and satiny. You can see that the neck is two piece. Fretboard wood not listed, darker than Laurel and I really like it. It’s dry, but I’ll oil it later. Some scuffs on the fretboard from the factory, probably the largest error on this instrument. Abalone (?) inlays are classy!

Frets all seated properly, no sprout but they did need a little more rounding on the ends. I don’t have a level, but I can play up to the 17th easily with no buzz.

Listed as a 42mm nut, I measured 41.3mm. 23mm thickness at the first (my Fender Jazz is 19.8 mm.) I can see why people say “chunky,” but I find it very comfortable and playable.

IMG_6289.jpeg
IMG_6292.jpeg


Hardware:
Tuner string posts measure at 8.5mm. Might take a 3/8” drop in… might not. Bridge is a little wide at 85mm. Looks like screw spacing is correct; might take a Fender spec drop in, but you might see a little of the old holes peeking out. Overall very useable, good in fact (bridge especially) so I have no plans to swap anything. Strap buttons are seated firmly. Says D’addario strings (whoa!) and I’ll keep ‘em on for a while.

Electronics:
Pickups measure about fender specs (P is a hair longer, J is bridge-sized) so should have no issues with a replacement. (I think I read someone put DiMarzios in.) Can’t see pot values without removing (and I don’t feel like it!) Cap is 0.022. Knobs are not seated perfectly level but not enough to bother me; pots are smooth, knobs are substantial and overall feels good. Jack plate is solid and jack itself seems fine.

I like the PJ sound, still deciding on the P. Not as bright as my Yamaha but still brighter (in the high mid) than most Fender/Squier/Aftermarket pickups. But that could be the strings, or the stock harness. I’ll let the strings mellow before I change anything. I’ll also see how it sounds at rehearsal next week.

IMG_6291.jpeg


Body:
Paint job is great, small ding on front but doesn’t really bother me. Control cavity is pretty sloppy though. Little cut-out for high fret access is a nice touch. Balance on a strap is perfect! Weight is 7.5lbs. Neck pocket just a hair under 2.5”.

IMG_6282.jpeg


Headstock:
Getting a PRS vibe. I like it better in person than in photos. There’s a little slice of pick guard plastic covering the truss access; which is pretty ugly inside. Guess I’ll keep the plastic!

IMG_6290.jpeg


Overall I really like it! With the price and amount of time I had to put into it, I’d give it a 9/10. Super fun to play, exactly what I was looking for. Hope this write up helps someone decide if this wild-card bass is right for you! :)
 
I was in the market for an inexpensive short scale. Saw this and thought I’d roll the dice; figured I could fix anything small and return if issues were major. They’re listed for $180 but MF had them on sale for $140. I believe Mitchell is a GC house brand.
Mitchell MB100 Short-Scale Solid-Body Electric Bass Guitar

View attachment 5259411

Setup:
Out of the box action was very high. Like 4mm or more. Neck screws were loose so I had to straighten the neck and screw those down. I thought I’d have to shim (and still might) but after adjusting the truss rod, I can get just-under Fender specs. Bridge saddles are low now, but not bottomed out. Nut is cut surprisingly well. Only a few tweaks to intonation. Definitely playable!

Neck:
Back of neck finish is fantastic, high point of this instrument. Better than many Squiers in the sub-$300 range, smooth and satiny. You can see that the neck is two piece. Fretboard wood not listed, darker than Laurel and I really like it. It’s dry, but I’ll oil it later. Some scuffs on the fretboard from the factory, probably the largest error on this instrument. Abalone (?) inlays are classy!

Frets all seated properly, no sprout but they did need a little more rounding on the ends. I don’t have a level, but I can play up to the 17th easily with no buzz.

Listed as a 42mm nut, I measured 41.3mm. 23mm thickness at the first (my Fender Jazz is 19.8 mm.) I can see why people say “chunky,” but I find it very comfortable and playable.

View attachment 5259410 View attachment 5259407

Hardware:
Tuner string posts measure at 8.5mm. Might take a 3/8” drop in… might not. Bridge is a little wide at 85mm. Looks like screw spacing is correct; might take a Fender spec drop in, but you might see a little of the old holes peeking out. Overall very useable, good in fact (bridge especially) so I have no plans to swap anything. Strap buttons are seated firmly. Says D’addario strings (whoa!) and I’ll keep ‘em on for a while.

Electronics:
Pickups measure about fender specs (P is a hair longer, J is bridge-sized) so should have no issues with a replacement. (I think I read someone put DiMarzios in.) Can’t see pot values without removing (and I don’t feel like it!) Cap is 0.022. Knobs are not seated perfectly level but not enough to bother me; pots are smooth, knobs are substantial and overall feels good. Jack plate is solid and jack itself seems fine.

I like the PJ sound, still deciding on the P. Not as bright as my Yamaha but still brighter (in the high mid) than most Fender/Squier/Aftermarket pickups. But that could be the strings, or the stock harness. I’ll let the strings mellow before I change anything. I’ll also see how it sounds at rehearsal next week.

View attachment 5259408

Body:
Paint job is great, small ding on front but doesn’t really bother me. Control cavity is pretty sloppy though. Little cut-out for high fret access is a nice touch. Balance on a strap is perfect! Weight is 7.5lbs. Neck pocket just a hair under 2.5”.

View attachment 5259412

Headstock:
Getting a PRS vibe. I like it better in person than in photos. There’s a little slice of pick guard plastic covering the truss access; which is pretty ugly inside. Guess I’ll keep the plastic!

View attachment 5259409

Overall I really like it! With the price and amount of time I had to put into it, I’d give it a 9/10. Super fun to play, exactly what I was looking for. Hope this write up helps someone decide if this wild-card bass is right for you! :)
Great review!
 
  • Like
Reactions: CallMeAl
How does the P pickup sound with the tone rolled down? Is it a fat P sound with some definition?

Im not really a PJ type but the overall design seems good...i would likely put on something like GHS Pressurewounds or Precision flats but its good to hear it has Dadarrio rounds, so you have a sort of reference to start with.
 
  • Like
Reactions: CallMeAl
How does the P pickup sound with the tone rolled down? Is it a fat P sound with some definition?

Im not really a PJ type but the overall design seems good...i would likely put on something like GHS Pressurewounds or Precision flats but its good to hear it has Dadarrio rounds, so you have a sort of reference to start with.
The tone knob is not very expressive. 0-2 has that muffled underwater tone. 2-8 is pretty good but not much range. 9-10 just adds that top end sparkle (mostly string noise!) But I was never one to use the tone at 0 setting even with my “good” pickups!
 
  • Like
Reactions: DavidEdenAria
The tone knob is not very expressive. 0-2 has that muffled underwater tone. 2-8 is pretty good but not much range. 9-10 just adds that top end sparkle (mostly string noise!) But I was never one to use the tone at 0 setting even with my “good” pickups!
Thanks....im fussy over the tone control at least 2 to 8 seems functional....tone pot could always be changed but a more gradual sweep is preferred....does the tone vary much between 2 to 8,is it gradual or barely change?
 
  • Like
Reactions: CallMeAl
Thanks....im fussy over the tone control at least 2 to 8 seems functional....tone pot could always be changed but a more gradual sweep is preferred....does the tone vary much between 2 to 8,is it gradual or barely change?
I’d say “gradual but barely” :laugh:

I think you know this, but the electronics are the weak link in any bass at this price, and it’s such a cheap and easy swap if you don’t like what’s in there :)
 
  • Like
Reactions: DavidEdenAria
I’d say “gradual but barely” :laugh:

I think you know this, but the electronics are the weak link in any bass at this price, and it’s such a cheap and easy swap if you don’t like what’s in there :)
Yea, the pots function or they dont but the sweep of the tone pot is crucial ...i would be inclined to replace the P pickup possibly, lots of decent options out there (boost and dirt pedals can overcome weak pickups sometimes imo)....bottom line, its still a function of the wood tone, im curious if the neck stays stable tuning wise long term.

The neck itself is what im most curious about....i like the overall design especially at this price point....keep us posted!
 
  • Like
Reactions: CallMeAl