TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
Some of those Spectors are remarkable basses, but in general they're overpriced, regardless of quality.
The reason is that it's a bear to produce that body shape. There are no flat or square reference surfaces to rely on, which makes things much more challenging, then there's all the shapework involved on the front and back. It takes a lot of work to make that comfy, belly hugging body.
He's been running with that body shape for decades now with darned few alternatives. He ought to come up with some new designs that doesn't require so much effort-intensive manufacturing techniques so people can buy into the Spector quality level without getting penalized by the production costs of that body shape.
All I can say is DAAMMMN. That is one sexy bass....I've been meaning to ask you about photos of your Vadim for a while as I recently came across a 4 string that was begging for me to buy her.
Spector and ESP are considered boutique?
I'll vote for Vadim Rubstov. Hardly known, does beautiful work.
![]()
+1Visually, some of the stuff Brubaker is making on the hig end is absolutely stunning. Nobody is finishing basses the way he is IMO.
I'd say ESP. My Vintage 4 plays better than almost any bass I've played (sans, you know, that '66 P bass...) I guess their Japanese factor where it was made also makes the Lakland Skyline series.
does he have a website?
Scott Hembry is a curious example, because as far as I have been able to determine, hardly anybody anywhere has ever touched one of his basses, so is he really underrated, or is it just that nobody would be able to rate him one way or the other?