I believe the term Essex was coined to comply with the search engines because SX will not be picked upped. Same with JayDee JD.
Exactly. The search engine will not recognize any terms comprised of less than three letters.
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
I believe the term Essex was coined to comply with the search engines because SX will not be picked upped. Same with JayDee JD.
I stopped playing for almost 10 years and an SX was the first bass I bought when I got back into it about 4-5 years ago.
Still really blown away at the quality-for-price ratio.
I guess my take on the whole thing is that I really can't justify spending $350+ for a bass to hack around on if I can get a ~$200 bass to do the same job.
Yeah. My take is that if the $200 bass + $150 in modification/aftermarket parts ends up giving better results than the $350 bass, the $200 is a better deal. I don't own an SX, but that's only because getting it shipped to Canada winds up bringing the cost to around $250. There's plenty of options for decent basses for a lower price than that locally.
I believe the term Essex was coined to comply with the search engines because SX will not be picked upped. Same with JayDee JD.

...I would HIGHLY recommend changing out the stock strings ASAP and put on a brand name set...