• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

My terrible Mike Arnopol experience

Status
Not open for further replies.
I accept that I have closed the door on this.

Well, posting this thread and feeding it with a comment suggesting greenboy was bad mouthing Mikes work isn't closing the door - just saying. It cost Mike a lot of time and money - maybe greenboy should of just built his cab for you himself.

Originally Posted by monsterthompson View Post
lots of folks missing the point here. i had no issue with the handling of the initial build. it was how the repair work and subsequent events have gone.

not to throw him too far under the bus, but greenboy has seen pics of the cab (inside and out) and been involved in the discussions about this. his statements have given me the impression that my experience and the current F115 were not what he would consider "top notch AB quality." based on that, i'm not feeling like i've gone way out on a limb here.
 
I'd just like to know what he was saying to Mike's customer (the OP) while all of this was taking place - and how it was helping.

It appears the OP and Mike don't wish to comment on this particular item and why drag a third party into this?

Here's what I've learned:
* A nice guy named Monster bought a cabinet
* The cabinet had problems
* The nice guy builder Mike tried to fix it although it appears that both parties agree that it was not fixed
* Odd in that Monster's cabinet was played by a bunch of mystery payers and apparently it created more business for Mike
* Odd in that I read that both parties still agree that the cabinet had problems
* Both are amicable and professional about the whole deal
* Maybe this is the first problem for the builder
* Both parties feel badly about the experience.

In hind sight, what would Monster and Mike have done differently if this were to happen again?

I'd like to learn something from this and I believe the answers are where the rubber meets the road.
 
It appears the OP and Mike don't wish to comment on this particular item and why drag a third party into this?

That's a good question for the OP - why did he drag a third party into this? Maybe because it revolved around him and Mike was caught in the middle? I don't know - that's why I asking.

I'd like to learn something from this and I believe the answers are where the rubber meets the road.

Me too and I agree - so lets hear the whole story.
 
I'd just like to know what he was saying to Mike's customer (the OP) while all of this was taking place - and how it was helping.

EDIT: If the OP is going to post comments like that on an open public forum for all of us to read - at least tell us the whole story.

It's greenboy's design. His baby. No offense to Mike but he is only the builder. Yes he represents himself but also greenboy.
At greenboy's behest Mr. Arnopol could make money off GB designs.
Its in everyone's best interest a quality product gets delivered.
I understand the OP dealt with the builder first. After repeated attempts he went to greenboy.
Wouldn't you do the same?
Greenboy isn't a third party. Its his product, as provided by his Authorized Builders.
Just like buying a Sony TV at best buy, immediate problems go to the store (authorized builder) bigger or unresolved ones go to the brand like Sony or in this case greenboy.
 
April 2012 – The cab arrives. It has an odd buzzing noise around the E-string 5th fret A notes. I contacted Mike, and he was bummed. We brainstormed, thinking it might be a mechanical rubbing. The reality is that the noise was only audible at low volumes and did not get louder as the volume was cranked, so I opted to live with the nuisance rather than ship the cab back for repairs. It sounded fine otherwise.

Nice cherry pick.
Not a cherry pick dude. Any semi-intelligent person can read the original post. Somebody said he should have complained immediately, implying that he didn't. In fact he did, so I showed only the relevant part.

Why does everything have to turn into a pissing contest?
 
Reading your posts in this thread, nothing constructive - strange view on the matter of things.

Here's "some" of the impression I've gotten from reading this thread. Mike was caught in the middle between his customer and the designer with cheap plastic and discontinued parts or hard to get components which was causing delays - and when Mike asked the designer for some extra help he didn't get it - but his work was bad mouthed instead and he was removed from the authorized list. Of course I only know what I've been reading here. But I find it very interesting and I would really like to know the whole truth - if you call that trolling, then so be it.
 
It appears the OP and Mike don't wish to comment on this particular item and why drag a third party into this?



Here's what I've learned:

* A nice guy named Monster bought a cabinet

* The cabinet had problems

* The nice guy builder Mike tried to fix it although it appears that both parties agree that it was not fixed

* Odd in that Monster's cabinet was played by a bunch of mystery payers and apparently it created more business for Mike

* Odd in that I read that both parties still agree that the cabinet had problems

* Both are amicable and professional about the whole deal

* Maybe this is the first problem for the builder

* Both parties feel badly about the experience.



In hind sight, what would Monster and Mike have done differently if this were to happen again?



I'd like to learn something from this and I believe the answers are where the rubber meets the road.


This is a gigantic portion what I've been trying to communicate with this story. I'm glad that it was understood.
 
@Joe Louvar

Please reread your posts. You started posting before this was ever mentioned and besides start your own thread if you want to discuss on the quality of parts being used in building cabs.
 
None of which are relevant to the problems with this cab, with the exception of possible sourcing delay during the repairs.

Your take is unneccessarily inflammatory toward *all* parties, and based almost entirely upon a pile of assumptions. Like i said, if truly you cared about information more than pot stirring, you'd be gathering information instead of working that spoon.
 
It's disingenuous to blame the cab's failure on the tweeter's plastic waveguide. The fiberglass material and mounting technique was inherently unstable. It was destined to shatter -- and buzz. Like Monster, I know this from experience. I had five fiberglass cabs, and every single one failed. So his story is not unique. The whole fiberglass concept was a disaster that could never have a happy ending. But none of us knew that, as we were beta testers on a product concept that was unproven. The execution was flawed and resulting fallout inevitable. It's really too bad. Some of us lost a lot of money chasing that dream. Never again for me! I'm a permanent convert to the stability of wood.
 
  • Like
Reactions: eddieout
It's greenboy's design. His baby. No offense to Mike but he is only the builder. Yes he represents himself but also greenboy.
At greenboy's behest Mr. Arnopol could make money off GB designs.
Its in everyone's best interest a quality product gets delivered.
I understand the OP dealt with the builder first. After repeated attempts he went to greenboy.
Wouldn't you do the same?
Greenboy isn't a third party. Its his product, as provided by his Authorized Builders.
Just like buying a Sony TV at best buy, immediate problems go to the store (authorized builder) bigger or unresolved ones go to the brand like Sony or in this case greenboy.

Best Buy doesn't build Sony TV's - lol, it's not even close to the same. BTW: this is why I said I think boutique cabinet designers builders like Barefaced has a bigger upper hand over Fearful - because Barefaced has precession tooling and in house oversight of QC and assumes all responsibilities including losses without putting the loss and or blame on a third party when a customer isn't happy.
 
It's disingenuous to blame the cab's failure on the tweeter's plastic waveguide. The fiberglass material and mounting technique was inherently unstable. It was destined to shatter -- and buzz. Like Monster, I know this from experience. I had five fiberglass cabs, and every single one failed. So his story is not unique. The whole fiberglass concept was a disaster that could never have a happy ending. But none of us knew that, as we were beta testers on a product concept that was unproven. The execution was flawed and resulting fallout inevitable. It's really too bad. Some of us lost a lot of money chasing that dream. Never again for me! I'm a permanent convert to the stability of wood.
+ A gazillion!

After my experiences with composite I would not touch it ever again. Besides with lighter woods available it really doesnt offer that much of an advantage. My AoN built 15/6 weighed 39.6LBS and my DIY 15/6 built from Italian Poplar weighed 43LBS. For a difference of 3.4LBS it is so *not* worth it to go composite. What a headache.
 
FWIW I've had my composite Dually that Mike built for about two years. I've gigged with it and moved it around plenty...I've had no issues whatsoever with stability or any structural damage and it sounds fantastic.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.