• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

NAD: Traynor SB500H (micro head) and SB115 Combo

Caveat right off the top. I'm one of Traynor's biggest fans. I also own the Traynor SB115, Yorkville (same as Traynor) XS400H and XS800H heads, TC210 and TC115 NEO cabs, and until this afternoon owned a Traynor YBA200-2. I have also owned many Yorkville cabs at one time or another (XC410, XC210, XC115, XC808).

I have owned other makes of amps and have played through pretty much every brand of amp at festivals where the backline is provided or at rental rehearsal rooms. I always hated the "blue fur" Yorkville models to be perfectly honest, but from the XS series heads on forward, I've been very happy with everything Traynor.

So you can take that in one of two ways ... I was going to love the SB500H no matter what, or the bar was set so high that the SB500H wouldn't be able to meet the high expectations.

I was prepared for the latter ... I had the funds to go completely the opposite way and get a full size Traynor DB 800H to replace my very dependable but very aged Yorkville XS800H. With my two 8-ohm cabs totalling 800W, I was unsure whether this tiny little amp (did I mention it weighs 3.5 pounds??) was going to have the guts to keep up. This is my first experience with a micro head of any make.

However, I have been regularly gigging with the SB115 combo for a few months now and I just love that thing. A 200W magic box as far as I'm concerned. So when the SB500H was announced, I knew I was getting it as soon as it was off the trucks and that was literally the case here. Long & McQuade just took shipment of the amps for the first time today. I was there with my $540 ($470 + tax) as fast as I could go without endangering lives.

So I've been home about 90 minutes, using the amp for just 45 minutes to this point. Still faces the crucially important band setting test. With that said, I've had enough "sounds awesome at home, not so awesome with the band" moments to better predict how it will sound at an actual gig.

So as a comparison, I'll start with the SB115 combo that is now my #1 gigging amp.

The SB115 (200W) is a VERY warm bassy amp, but I don't find it muddy at all. It can be heard through a full band mix with ease. Just very deep, with more bass than I ever expected from a lightweight combo (31 pounds). Depending on the room I'm in, I typically have the bass flat, both mids at 2 o'clock, and treble could be anywhere between noon and 2. I have NO use for Low Expander (a variation of scoop) on this amp at all. Always off. In a full band setting (two guitars, keys, pedal steel and hard hitting drummer) I have the gain at about 10 o'clock and volume at 60%. With PA support, I hear myself on stage better than I ever had. Love what I'm hearing. I also keep the amp on a stand angled up towards my head. Last Friday I played a fairly decent sized club with no PA support. I kept pretty much the same settings and volume. I sensed I was getting heard out front and my wife captured a bit of video from the show on her iPhone with that tiny phone mic and I was very happy to hear the bass coming through the way I had hoped.

Now the Traynor SB500H (500W) seems to be a totally different amp altogether. Same controls and everything, but tonally very different. I'm assuming that mostly has to do with the cabs - in this case Traynor 210 and 115 NEOs but I’m not entirely sure.

As far as using a 500W head with cabs that are 400W each (8 ohms) ... no problems here. I never understood the whole cab matching thing and I know many TBers would be aghast with my rig ... combining a 210 with a 115 and an amp that has a wattage rating lower than my cabs. Hey, it works for me! The cabs sound great together with 400W, 500W and 800W heads.

But I digress ...

Everything flat, the SB500H sounds GREAT, but bright and cutting. Not shrill or brittle bright - just brighter than I was expecting after using the SB115 regularly. With the 500H, I'm definitely going to be using the Low Expander to "warm" things up a little. Also, it will pump out more volume than I ever need - no issues there. But at 500W, it is not as loud as my 400W Yorkville XS400H. I'm no technician but do realize that wattage as a predictor of volume can be a fallacy. Either way, no concerns volume wise at all.

Very focused tight tone. I couldn’t make it sound muddy no matter what I did. With my Yorkville XS400H or 800H, my tone could get a little too “boomy” on occasion. I’m finding the SB500H to have a full bottom end, but like my comment about mud, I’m not sure “boomy” is possible with my setup. “Balanced” – that’s the word. String to string balance was a noticeable improvement as I’m used to having to lay back a bit when hitting my E string. I don't get that E-strong boom with this amp. Not sure what the secret is there … the amp doesn’t have a built in compressor or anything, and I’m thinking I won’t need my compressor pedal when using this set up. I’m giving credit to the amp over the cabs since I’ve used the cabs with other heads. The 500H is a very unique animal in my experience.

Tone controls have a very wide range too – again I’m no technician and I wouldn’t understand the frequency specs if I actually read them, but adjusting each control from, say, noon to one o’clock makes a noticeable difference.

Between my two most recent amp purchases, the SB115 combo and the SB500H head, the SB115 combo is still going to be coming with me on the majority of gigs. It awesome that the 500H is only 3.5 pounds, and I have NEO cabs … but the 31 pound combo is still more convenient to transport and has power to spare for most of the gigs I do (mostly with PA support).

However, for $470 and in search for a new head after selling my Traynor YBA200-2 (I much prefer solid-state amps) the SB500H is a hands-down winner in my books.

Edit #1: The apparent increased loudness from the XS400H vs the SB500H was an apparent trick to my ears. I realized I never use the scoop control on the XS400H, but had the Low Expander (to me, it's a scoop) on the SB500H. The adjustment in reducing the mids caused me to perceive a lower volume. I turned the amp back on, turned the Low Expander control off without adjusting any thing else ... hello more loudness!

Edit #2: I failed to mention build quality. Traynor has a reputation of building gear that you could toss off the top of a skyscraper and it would only incur cosmetic damage. Time will tell, but the SB500H is all metal, has brackets so that if for some reason you dropped it face first, the controls would never touch the ground. It may not survive a fall off a skyscraper, but it surely would if some drunk knocked it off the top of your cab.

Edit #3: Tone / frequency specs:
Treble: 8kHz
Hi-Mid: 1kHz
Lo-Mid: 400Hz
Bass: 50Hz
Low Expander: 40Hz boost, 550Hz cut, 10kHz cut

Picture time!! ...

SB500Front_zps67b1196c.jpg


SB500Back_zps992ecdf2.jpg


FullSB500Rig_zps4fd33d24.jpg
 
Last edited:
Nice! I too am a big Traynor/Yorkville fan and have owned several of their amps and cabs.
Thinking about getting the same amp!
I am trying to decide between a pair of the TC115neo or the DNBx12. THe DNBX12 has a lower cutoff frequency, but that old 115 yorkville I had stood up to a 1000 watts regularly and never did melt and sure sounded good!
What do you think a pair of the 115neo instead of the 210 aetup would sound like with the SB500h?
 
Also, have you ever tried the SB115 with the TC115Neo?

Ummm ... is that even possible? Not sure, since the SB115 is already a 4-ohm cab and the 115Neo is 8-ohms. Either way, I always gig with the SB115 at about 60% volume and gain at 10 o'clock - way below it's capacity and never feel a need to add another cab to it. As far as I know though, it's not possible. Edit: Double-checked. The SB115 does not have an external speaker output.

Two 115NEOs with the SB500H may possibly be better than the 210/115 I'm running. The head, as I mentioned has a lot of punch and no mud at all that I can hear even at it's "bassiest" settings. I'm sticking with what I have since it's what I already had and it works. If starting from scratch though, it's definitely worth trying I would think!
 
Last edited:
great review CP.....as someone who bought one of the 1st 200h models at L& MQ's, glad to hear that it seems fantastic.....guessing it would be very similar to the 200H but LOUDER!!
nice looking set of cabs too
I usually have all dials at 2 o'clock and Bass expander at either 11 or 2, depending, and sometime back off the treble to 11.....it kills through my Eden 15" and KA-BOOM if I add another 15" cab
 
Yes, thanks. I didn't realize that the SB series were 4 ohms. Saw they didn't have a speaker out after I posted. Guess they were trying to maximize power in the size.
I do believe the separate cabs are the way for me to go. Now to decide between the 15's or the 12's...
 
I really dig the Traynor gear...I have a TC112 which is neo...and a TC115 which is not neo...and a Yorkville Bassmaster 800...and it sounds just great...tried some of the class d stuff but found it a little "sterile" sounding like some of the ss amps I've had in the past...which is why I moved to a tube pre mosfet type amp...your excitement about the new amp has me interested though...good luck with your new rig...
 
...tried some of the class d stuff but found it a little "sterile" sounding like some of the ss amps I've had in the past...which is why I moved to a tube pre mosfet type amp

I hear you! In my pre-Traynor / Yorkville days, I gigged with a Genz Benz 600GBE. Awesome amp - not Class-D, but super clean and almost "too perfect" in a weird way. Very sterile to my ears. The SB500H is similar in terms of being super clean and tight, but I really like it. I can't describe it correctly, and don't have technological knowledge with amps, but there's this naturally compressed thing happening in terms of string to string balance that is noticeable with both my SB amps compared to my other amps. It's very pleasing to keep my attack fairly consistent across all strings and not have the E-string "boom". Something to do with how their tone controls are focused on just the perfect frequencies for the basses I use maybe (passive Fender P-basses, Gretsch G5440 hollowbody). A narrower frequency range that is focused in a very good way - that's what I hear. I can't wait for the "gig test"- I have to wait until May 24 for that though!
 
Last edited:
Yes, please remember to post back after the gig! Very interested in this amp's performance.

Interesting about the balanced string sound. I have noticed that some combinations emphasize (or de-emphasize) to the point it is very difficult to get that balance across the strings.
 
Nice review, thanks for taking the time. Friggin Traynor still built in Canada. Legit. :beaver:
Yes, built in North America and a company that will stand behind their products is worth a lot to me.

I just tried to get a Yamaha amp repaired and couldn't do so. It was a 300 amp and to repair it would cost estimate well over what it retailed for. And this was after being sent around the universe trying to get information.
I am not a fan of companies that don't stand behind their products 100%. Yorkville/Traynor does.
 
Good review. I also have owned a few traynor cabs/amp. The one thing I prefer about the db800 over the micros is the HUGE amount of tone shaping you can do. I would love the see the scoop,resonance control, distortion, and all those other amazing features on the little guys. Actually,if the db800 was just a straight pre you could pair to power amp, that would be amazing
 
  • Like
Reactions: blindrabbit
Good review. I also have owned a few traynor cabs/amp. The one thing I prefer about the db800 over the micros is the HUGE amount of tone shaping you can do. I would love the see the scoop,resonance control, distortion, and all those other amazing features on the little guys. Actually,if the db800 was just a straight pre you could pair to power amp, that would be amazing

I loved my very old and ready to be retired XS800H (exact same as the DB800H but with "Yorkville" branding) and still love my XS400H, but for all the controls on those amps, I personally found my fave settings, marked them, and then rarely changed them. I easily get confused with too many options. For me I just twiddled the knobs until I found the a sound with nice tight bottom and singing highs ... a little zingy. I found the tube pre-amp to be a bit overpowering to be honest so always used them as straight solid state.

I actually like that the SB500H gives me what I'm looking for with a minimum of knob turning. Very clean and I cannot stress enough how tight the bottom is. Now someone else will come along an may think it's the worst amp head they ever played through, but it has all the things I was personally looking for. Besides the tone, it has 2 Speakon outlets, effect loop, the tone controls it does have provide a wide variety of tones, tuner out. The "Low Expander" is a scoop, by the way. The way they describe it in the manual it seems like it's more than just a scoop - but I think it's just a scoop!

Anything else would just add to the cost (just $470), and would require a larger casing. There is not a sliver of space on the front panel to add anything else. For grit / distortion and compression, I have pedals that deliver righteously and I prefer having control over that at my feet to be honest. Resonance ... I used it on my XS800H but in a live situation playing in all sorts of different rooms, there wasn't much I could do that made a difference to what the audience heard or what I was hearing on stage ... too many other bigger variables at play.

So they really are different animals and I'm certainly keeping my XS400H for that very reason. But for simply clean, tight, yet full-range tone, I can't say enough good things about the SB500H (or the SB115 for that matter). The lightweight of the SB500H is nice I guess, but is not the reason I'd recommend it (you still have to lug cabs around, so a 40 pound head over a 3.5 pound head isn't that big a deal). I just think it's a great amp period.

NOW ... let's hope I feel the same way after playing with a full band, outdoors, the weekend after next! :) This thread could suddenly go in reverse, but I'm not too worried.
 
Last edited:
Good review. I also have owned a few traynor cabs/amp. The one thing I prefer about the db800 over the micros is the HUGE amount of tone shaping you can do. I would love the see the scoop,resonance control, distortion, and all those other amazing features on the little guys. Actually,if the db800 was just a straight pre you could pair to power amp, that would be amazing

If they could get the db800 pre into a micro/class d head, I'd be very interested. As for these new Traynor micros, my concern is that they sound "GK-ish", which is at the opposite end of the tonal spectrum that I want to be at (my current amp, which I love, is an Aguilar TH350). Nonetheless, as soon as I see one pop up at my local LMQ, I'll give it a try.
 
If they could get the db800 pre into a micro/class d head, I'd be very interested. As for these new Traynor micros, my concern is that they sound "GK-ish", which is at the opposite end of the tonal spectrum that I want to be at (my current amp, which I love, is an Aguilar TH350). Nonetheless, as soon as I see one pop up at my local LMQ, I'll give it a try.
.for sure you should try it.......I think they are warmer than GKs and no hiss.....try the 200 watt version...I love mine.....
 
I am really appreciative of this review. The SB500H has not hit the west coast yet and I am so tempted to order one. The new Fender Rumble 500 is about to be released as well but its an amp made overseas and I am not confident it would be any better then the Traynor which is going to sell for a bit more then the Fender. I would love to hear a shootout with the Traynor, Rumble and the GK MB500 which I owned but found a bit sterile.
 
...As for these new Traynor micros, my concern is that they sound "GK-ish", which is at the opposite end of the tonal spectrum that I want to be at (my current amp, which I love, is an Aguilar TH350).

... I would love to hear a shootout with the Traynor, Rumble and the GK MB500 which I owned but found a bit sterile.

As I mentioned in one of my posts above, I don't have much knowledge of the impact different tone control frequencies have in terms of the "big" picture. However, there does seem to be quite a difference (on paper at least) in the low mids between the Traynor SB500H and GK MB500. How that would translate to my ears, I have no idea but I suspect it's the Lo-Mids at 400Hz that is key to what I keep referring to as that tighter than tight tone :)

Traynor SB500H
Treble: 8kHz
Hi-Mid: 1kHz
Lo-Mid: 400Hz
Bass: 50Hz
Low Expander: 40Hz boost, 550Hz cut, 10kHz cut

GK MB500
Treble: 7kHz
Hi-Mid: 1kHz
Lo-Mid: 205Hz
Bass: 60Hz

Aguilar TH500
Treble: 4 kHz
Mid Range: 180 Hz – 1 kHz
Bass: 40 Hz
 
Last edited: