TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
Nice looking bass, sounds good too.Problem is, i'm over this trend of flame maple over the base body wood. Problem is i don't know why! A mild and tasteful spalt? Subtle tiger eye? Bit of pretty Bubinga and they would of had me. But again, nice sounding, robust bass.
Electronics are the same, woodwork is different. 500 series are mahogany, and 600 are laminated alder/maple.Sweetwater has the TRBX604 in black. Does anyone know what is the difference between the 604 and the 504? It looks the same as a black 504, the spec seems the same, but +$100. Did they do something to the electronics?
I tried both. The Sire (at least the one I tried) felt somewhat unfinished, cheaper, the materials seemed less quality. Soundwise both were very good. The Yamaha's high-mids are a little too present and and had to cut them a little on the Ampeg rig at the store, the Sire highs are nice, but can get a little too brilliant in tweeter equipped amps. Bought the Yamaha.A serious rival to Sire, IMHO.
I have TRBX 605 and i did have the oportunity to play the TRBX 505 before getting the 605 and honestly if you own the 505 there is no point in getting the 600's series.The sound is very similar, i can say that because of the alder body the TRBX 605 has a sound that is just a little more brighter than the TRBX 505, but besides that and the look of the bass the 500´s and the 600´s series are practicly the same bass. But in my case what makes me bought this one instead of the 505 was the look of the bass, so for me the looks worth the extra money.It looks like the stole a page from the Ibanez playbook. Same bass has the TRBX500 but with a flame maple top finish. Good Looking but does this warrants the extra dough? Not sure...