• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

NEW: ZOOM B2 FOUR...

I wonder if the "Please wait.. saving settings" has anything to do with the 'auto save' functionality (which I REALLY like)?

Not sure because the MS60B also has 'auto save' but there is no power switch, so probably the settings are saved right after making edits.

Very nice review, thanks!

I've enjoyed getting acquainted with the B2 Four. Because there's not a lot of review info out there, I offer this review for users and potential buyers. It has some info not found in the docs or online. Strap in, though, it's a long one. I hope you find it helpful.


HARDWARE

The design and build-quality seem like a good balance of durability, simplicity, and functionality. The 1/4" jacks are metal, mounted on the plastic chassis. The 3.5mm headphone & aux in jacks are not metal and not chassis-mounted. Buttons all feel solid. The recessed 9V power jack is clever, but might not fit some power cords.

The cursor buttons are difficult to use with the foot. Pressing the right buttons our foot blocks the display. A diamond configuration would have been more intuitive and easier access with a foot; especially if the buttons had carefully-designed raised shapes.

Where it counts, the display is bright enough, and easy enough to read for calling up presets and menu operations. For editing, bring it up off the floor, and/or use the GL for B2 Four app.

Turning off with the power button, the display shows "Please wait... Saving Settings." So is powering off by unplugging or power strip switch a bad idea?

ROUTING

With only 5-slots, a serial-only path, and no send-return loop; routing options are limited. Fortunately, we can place any FX in any order (within CPU constraints). The DI/XLR out and 1/4" outs are both fixed as post-FX. So both can be wet, or both can be dry, but we can't have dry DI and wet 1/4" outs, which would have been useful.

The mono input can be run through stereo reverbs, delays, and mod FX. However, if we place any mono module after a stereo module, the signal becomes mono (unless the mono modules are bypassed) This also applies to the DI model. Even if those mono modules have wet/dry mix, the dry output is always mono. So if we want to hear stereo FX, they must be placed AFTER any mono FX modules, and the DI model must be OFF.

LEVELS

The global EQ with 3 fixed bands (low/mid/high) and a master volume are helpful. However, the lack of a patch-volume setting is disappointing. This requires us to control levels via preamps, amps and fx in ways that won't affect tone. This just means more steps. As long as we do an occasional A/B comparison of dry bass level (bypass all) with the level of the patch, we can probably stay within a reasonable range.

EQ/TONE CONTROL

Because of the multi-layer convolution, the amp/cab combos are hardwired (no IR swapping or user IR's).

With EQ we can adjust the tone/character pretty freely. The EQ modules include a low shelf/HPF, a single-band sweepable peak/notch, and a high shelf/LPF, graphic EQs, a splitter, and an exciter. The parametric EQ's are one-band-per-module, so we use up three slots to get a 3-band parametric. Some of the preamps and amps have EQs, with either fixed frequencies or just a few selections.

GENERAL SOUND

Dynamic range refers to how well a unit reproduces every level of playing from very soft to very loud-- without compressing or limiting the very loudest notes. I think the B2 Four does pretty well with dynamics, some preamps & amps will squish/limit more than others.

Most of the factory patches celebrate cabinet resonances from around 40 Hz to maybe 120Hz. It's a hump in the low or low-mid range. Fortunately, we can remove or reduce this hump either with preamp EQ, amp EQ, or an EQ module.

I didn't notice any latency; except with some pitch fx.

Depending on what is in the chain, there can be varying amounts of noise. Usually the Zoom Noise Reduction (which is excellent) takes care of it.

I was playing with a env filter, and noticed the output was clipping; so I put a compressor after the filter, and it cleaned up. This implies that there is plenty of headroom within the module path, but you have to make sure to get it down to a reasonable level by the time it reaches the output stage.

THE FX

The compressors sound good. Most are snappy enough for slap. Good range of adjustments and nice variety of options. They have much better quality and response than those on the B1 Four.

The Slow Attack module is disappointing. Each note starts from zero and ramps up -- which is unnatural sounding. I was hoping to use this for an "arco" (bowed) effect, no luck. If there was a dry level, then a dry attack and decay could be enhanced by a natural swell. That would be ideal.

Many of the envelope followers are too sensitive, even with the sensitivity all the way down. I often don't want the filter open all the way even when I play loud. Auto Filter is a welcome exception.

The Envelope Generator filter snaps to a 2nd frequencies when the foot switch is pressed, then immediately begins gliding back to 1st frequency at the set "speed" (regardless of holding the switch).

With the Zoom NR, we can put it anywhere in our path, and set it to either detect signal from the EFXIN (whatever signal is preset at that point in the chain) or GTRIN (which is like side-chaining the dry input signal). I usually choose GTRIN.

The Drive FX all seem to have a similar character.

The preamps have useful EQ and drive options.

I love all the modulation modules; EXCEPT for Tremolo which is very limited. The triangle waveform is ok. The TUBE and SQUARE are both clicky, and none of them sound like a proper tremolo. I've heard much better tremolos, even from Zoom.

Most of the pitch-shifters are barely useable. The bass polyphonic is ok for octaves. Harmony, Bass Mono Pitch Shift, and Pitch Shift are cartoonishly unusable. The other octavers seem ok, but fall apart on lower notes.

The Bass Talk Synth is too bright & edgy, and the tone knob doesn't begin to tame it, so it needs some filter/EG after. The Z Synth and Bass Synth are both great.

The delays are fine.

The reverbs are just ok. Not good enough to "feature" them.

The Air module is actually quite a nice stereo-izer when the values are cranked. When summed to mono, it sounds like a small room (but still good).

The fretless is subtle and cool. I wish it had a dry level. Combined the flip-top, we might get fairly close to an upright pizz character.

The amps seem good. Some tend to be woofy and humpy in the lows; and the hump can't be tamed with the amp's EQ controls. Thankfully, an EQ or preamp can flatten it, if needed.

PATCHES

The patches don't show off a ton of range or versatility. But they focus on usable tones. There are varying degrees of drive, lots of clean tones with hyped lows or low mids. The env filters are all too wide open. Makes me wonder if they were made with/for low output basses?

Fortunately any and all patches can be tweaked and over-written in their same ID number. If we ever want the original factory patch back, that's easily done.

USEABILITY

FUN FACT: when we are in the FX Library (choosing a module with arrows), we are auditioning the modules by themselves in isolation from what is in the rest our chain; and we can adjust knobs while in the library, so we can adjust before choosing.

In the editor, when we turn a knob the values appear, then vanish after 3 seconds. Frustrating. I understand why it is this way, but I don't like it.

It woudl be better if Zoom added a preference setting for

Knob Display Dwell Time:
3 seconds
5 seconds
10 seconds
BUTTON EXIT (pressing the center button exits the knob-value display)

Better yet, Zoom could just use the screen real-estate differently Put the patch #/name and slot dots on top of the screen, same size, and rework the module graphics. This way knobs could just be always visible for the currently selected module.

APP

I installed the app before I bought the unit, to see if I could learn stuff just from the app, but it has no "off-line" mode, so no dice. Once my unit arrived, connecting the unit was easy enough. BTW, I have no qualms about buying the app for $1.

There are three sections:

The Effect Pool shows a full list of available FX modules (FX, amps). I don't know if Zoom will put new FX there as they become available, but for now it is a list of all of the built-in modules with descriptions. From here we can remove some FX from our unit, or put them back. This could reduce unwanted clutter in the FX Library on the unit.

The Patch Pool is empty until we load some patches into it. As far as I can tell, we cannot remove patches from the Patch Pool.

In the News Feed, there is an option to download the factory patches which puts them in our Patch Pool.

The Editor is nice because it doesn't do the disappearing knobs trick. To change/add an FX module, choose "Change". Then tap a slot or module. It helps to think of "blank" as a pass-thru module. Enable/bypass via the square above each module. Re-order by tapping/holding on a module then drag.

SUMMARY

I have no regrets about this purchase. I knew I'd be getting good basic FX and signal path. It will serve the purpose I intended.

Pros: Versatile, flexible, uncomplicated. Many good and useable FX modules. 300 slots.

Cons: No patch level setting. Slow Attack module lacks dry level. Env Filters have poor sensitivity range. Knob display awkward. Tremolo needs reworked. Most pitch shifters weak. Cursor buttons awkward for foot. Reverbs mediocre. Routing limitations. DI models prevent stereo operation.
 
Bookmarked for future reference. What an outstanding breakdown, thanks! Concise, well-detailed, and you don't shy away from discussing the frustrations/shortcomings like so many other reviewers out there in general seem to do for any given product in order to better justify their purchase in their mind lol. Appreciate it!

I've enjoyed getting acquainted with the B2 Four. Because there's not a lot of review info out there, I offer this review for users and potential buyers. It has some info not found in the docs or online. Strap in, though, it's a long one. I hope you find it helpful.


HARDWARE

The design and build-quality seem like a good balance of durability, simplicity, and functionality. The 1/4" jacks are metal, mounted on the plastic chassis. The 3.5mm headphone & aux in jacks are not metal and not chassis-mounted. Buttons all feel solid. The recessed 9V power jack is clever, but might not fit some power cords.

The cursor buttons are difficult to use with the foot. Pressing the right buttons our foot blocks the display. A diamond configuration would have been more intuitive and easier access with a foot; especially if the buttons had carefully-designed raised shapes.

Where it counts, the display is bright enough, and easy enough to read for calling up presets and menu operations. For editing, bring it up off the floor, and/or use the GL for B2 Four app.

Turning off with the power button, the display shows "Please wait... Saving Settings." So is powering off by unplugging or power strip switch a bad idea?

ROUTING

With only 5-slots, a serial-only path, and no send-return loop; routing options are limited. Fortunately, we can place any FX in any order (within CPU constraints). The DI/XLR out and 1/4" outs are both fixed as post-FX. So both can be wet, or both can be dry, but we can't have dry DI and wet 1/4" outs, which would have been useful.

The mono input can be run through stereo reverbs, delays, and mod FX. However, if we place any mono module after a stereo module, the signal becomes mono (unless the mono modules are bypassed) This also applies to the DI model. Even if those mono modules have wet/dry mix, the dry output is always mono. So if we want to hear stereo FX, they must be placed AFTER any mono FX modules, and the DI model must be OFF.

LEVELS

The global EQ with 3 fixed bands (low/mid/high) and a master volume are helpful. However, the lack of a patch-volume setting is disappointing. This requires us to control levels via preamps, amps and fx in ways that won't affect tone. This just means more steps. As long as we do an occasional A/B comparison of dry bass level (bypass all) with the level of the patch, we can probably stay within a reasonable range.

EQ/TONE CONTROL

Because of the multi-layer convolution, the amp/cab combos are hardwired (no IR swapping or user IR's).

With EQ we can adjust the tone/character pretty freely. The EQ modules include a low shelf/HPF, a single-band sweepable peak/notch, and a high shelf/LPF, graphic EQs, a splitter, and an exciter. The parametric EQ's are one-band-per-module, so we use up three slots to get a 3-band parametric. Some of the preamps and amps have EQs, with either fixed frequencies or just a few selections.

GENERAL SOUND

Dynamic range refers to how well a unit reproduces every level of playing from very soft to very loud-- without compressing or limiting the very loudest notes. I think the B2 Four does pretty well with dynamics, some preamps & amps will squish/limit more than others.

Most of the factory patches celebrate cabinet resonances from around 40 Hz to maybe 120Hz. It's a hump in the low or low-mid range. Fortunately, we can remove or reduce this hump either with preamp EQ, amp EQ, or an EQ module.

I didn't notice any latency; except with some pitch fx.

Depending on what is in the chain, there can be varying amounts of noise. Usually the Zoom Noise Reduction (which is excellent) takes care of it.

I was playing with a env filter, and noticed the output was clipping; so I put a compressor after the filter, and it cleaned up. This implies that there is plenty of headroom within the module path, but you have to make sure to get it down to a reasonable level by the time it reaches the output stage.

THE FX

The compressors sound good. Most are snappy enough for slap. Good range of adjustments and nice variety of options. They have much better quality and response than those on the B1 Four.

The Slow Attack module is disappointing. Each note starts from zero and ramps up -- which is unnatural sounding. I was hoping to use this for an "arco" (bowed) effect, no luck. If there was a dry level, then a dry attack and decay could be enhanced by a natural swell. That would be ideal.

Many of the envelope followers are too sensitive, even with the sensitivity all the way down. I often don't want the filter open all the way even when I play loud. Auto Filter is a welcome exception.

The Envelope Generator filter snaps to a 2nd frequencies when the foot switch is pressed, then immediately begins gliding back to 1st frequency at the set "speed" (regardless of holding the switch).

With the Zoom NR, we can put it anywhere in our path, and set it to either detect signal from the EFXIN (whatever signal is preset at that point in the chain) or GTRIN (which is like side-chaining the dry input signal). I usually choose GTRIN.

The Drive FX all seem to have a similar character.

The preamps have useful EQ and drive options.

I love all the modulation modules; EXCEPT for Tremolo which is very limited. The triangle waveform is ok. The TUBE and SQUARE are both clicky, and none of them sound like a proper tremolo. I've heard much better tremolos, even from Zoom.

Most of the pitch-shifters are barely useable. The bass polyphonic is ok for octaves. Harmony, Bass Mono Pitch Shift, and Pitch Shift are cartoonishly unusable. The other octavers seem ok, but fall apart on lower notes.

The Bass Talk Synth is too bright & edgy, and the tone knob doesn't begin to tame it, so it needs some filter/EG after. The Z Synth and Bass Synth are both great.

The delays are fine.

The reverbs are just ok. Not good enough to "feature" them.

The Air module is actually quite a nice stereo-izer when the values are cranked. When summed to mono, it sounds like a small room (but still good).

The fretless is subtle and cool. I wish it had a dry level. Combined the flip-top, we might get fairly close to an upright pizz character.

The amps seem good. Some tend to be woofy and humpy in the lows; and the hump can't be tamed with the amp's EQ controls. Thankfully, an EQ or preamp can flatten it, if needed.

PATCHES

The patches don't show off a ton of range or versatility. But they focus on usable tones. There are varying degrees of drive, lots of clean tones with hyped lows or low mids. The env filters are all too wide open. Makes me wonder if they were made with/for low output basses?

Fortunately any and all patches can be tweaked and over-written in their same ID number. If we ever want the original factory patch back, that's easily done.

USEABILITY

FUN FACT: when we are in the FX Library (choosing a module with arrows), we are auditioning the modules by themselves in isolation from what is in the rest our chain; and we can adjust knobs while in the library, so we can adjust before choosing.

In the editor, when we turn a knob the values appear, then vanish after 3 seconds. Frustrating. I understand why it is this way, but I don't like it.

It woudl be better if Zoom added a preference setting for

Knob Display Dwell Time:
3 seconds
5 seconds
10 seconds
BUTTON EXIT (pressing the center button exits the knob-value display)

Better yet, Zoom could just use the screen real-estate differently Put the patch #/name and slot dots on top of the screen, same size, and rework the module graphics. This way knobs could just be always visible for the currently selected module.

APP

I installed the app before I bought the unit, to see if I could learn stuff just from the app, but it has no "off-line" mode, so no dice. Once my unit arrived, connecting the unit was easy enough. BTW, I have no qualms about buying the app for $1.

There are three sections:

The Effect Pool shows a full list of available FX modules (FX, amps). I don't know if Zoom will put new FX there as they become available, but for now it is a list of all of the built-in modules with descriptions. From here we can remove some FX from our unit, or put them back. This could reduce unwanted clutter in the FX Library on the unit.

The Patch Pool is empty until we load some patches into it. As far as I can tell, we cannot remove patches from the Patch Pool.

In the News Feed, there is an option to download the factory patches which puts them in our Patch Pool.

The Editor is nice because it doesn't do the disappearing knobs trick. To change/add an FX module, choose "Change". Then tap a slot or module. It helps to think of "blank" as a pass-thru module. Enable/bypass via the square above each module. Re-order by tapping/holding on a module then drag.

SUMMARY

I have no regrets about this purchase. I knew I'd be getting good basic FX and signal path. It will serve the purpose I intended.

Pros: Versatile, flexible, uncomplicated. Many good and useable FX modules. 300 slots.

Cons: No patch level setting. Slow Attack module lacks dry level. Env Filters have poor sensitivity range. Knob display awkward. Tremolo needs reworked. Most pitch shifters weak. Cursor buttons awkward for foot. Reverbs mediocre. Routing limitations. DI models prevent stereo operation.
 
Bookmarked for future reference. What an outstanding breakdown, thanks! Concise, well-detailed, and you don't shy away from discussing the frustrations/shortcomings like so many other reviewers out there in general seem to do for any given product in order to better justify their purchase in their mind lol. Appreciate it!

Thanks, Zarcsby. I'm glad you found it helpful.

Couple typo's though:

1. About the amps, I said "the hump can't be tamed with the amp's EQ controls" but I meant to say "can't always be tamed" I had mixed results adjusting them using the bass knob.

2. In the PROS, I said "300 slots". To be clear, 5-slots per patch. 300 patch locations, and users can overwrite any and all factory patches (and restore them).

Zoom's developers often choose simplicity over depth. This usually means only 1 page of 4-knobs for most modules, sometimes an important parameter is missing (e.g. dry level, LPF, etc.). I'm much more of a control freq than that, but I have other devices to scratch that itch.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Zarcsby
Zoom's developers often choose simplicity over depth. This usually means only 1 page of 4-knobs for most modules, sometimes an important parameter is missing (e.g. dry level, LPF, etc.). I'm much more of a control freq than that, but I have other devices to scratch that itch.

Well, the old Zoom B1(X) on and other older Zoom multi fxs have usually 6 or more options/knobs per patch, so the trend to simplicity/less options is quite new for Zoom...
I guess I would miss several of these options, including dry/wet mixes or cab choice per amp model...
 
My MS-100BT experiences were years ago, so I'm afraid my comparisons won't be fair.

I'd say if you're happy with the MS-60B, why fix what ain't broke?

Are you running into a particular sonic obstacles with the MS-60B (i.e., stuff you wish it could do but it can't)?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Zoot H Rollo
I'm still using the Zoom MS60B pretty happily.

Anyone compare the B2 four to it?

I love the batteries and small size of the MS60B. Are the amp models significantly better to warrant giving up the those features?

I am also still using a MS60B in one of my bands. This pedal has such a great size<>features ratio! There is nothing comparable IMO.

You can also power the pedal through the USB port with a power-bank.

Sorry for off topic but it seems @Zoot H Rollo needs to know everything about this pedal so he can order one :):D.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Zoot H Rollo
My MS-100BT experiences were years ago, so I'm afraid my comparisons won't be fair.

I'd say if you're happy with the MS-60B, why fix what ain't broke?

Are you running into a particular sonic obstacles with the MS-60B (i.e., stuff you wish it could do but it can't)?
No particular sonic obstacles. Mainly curiosity. I most likely won't switch to the B2 four because the size of the MS-60B is hard to beat. Really I can't think of anything on the market that does as much in this size pedal. I wish they would update the MS series with their latest tech.
 
I am also still using a MS60B in one of my bands. This pedal has such a great size<>features ratio! There is nothing comparable IMO.

You can also power the pedal through the USB port with a power-bank.

Sorry for off topic but it seems @Zoot H Rollo needs to know everything about this pedal so he can order one :):D.

HA! Guilty as charged!

Almost did.

No particular sonic obstacles. Mainly curiosity. I most likely won't switch to the B2 four because the size of the MS-60B is hard to beat. Really I can't think of anything on the market that does as much in this size pedal. I wish they would update the MS series with their latest tech.

The AMP and CAB selection is fantastic with the MS60B (Eden, GK...)

If Zoom could develop a B6 level unit with better processing power and ALL the legacy Amp, Cab, Preamp, etc... models...

i'll get a Zoom tattoo on my Beefheart.
 
Here are few new bits of info....

The expression pedal input is only for the pedal modules (i.e., no realtime control of other parameters). Though Zoom doesn't publish this, the expression jack is designed to "see" the pot's center lug (wiper) on the ring of the TRS plug-- as opposed to the tip. My Moog expression pedal has a switch (from "Standard" to "Other"). If your pedal doesn't respond right, you can either re-solder it internally, or make a special TRS-to-TRS cable where you cross the tip on one end to the ring on the other end & vice versa.

REVERBS:
The reverbs are a little better than I said in my previous post. Ironically, Bright Hall and Bright Room are the only reverbs with a TONE control (LPF). So the two "bright" reverbs are the only ones with darkening capability.

SFX:
I wish the Bomber had three modes: fart, plop, and explosion. I'd use the first two more. This was the first module I removed with the app.

PEDAL:
The pedal effects are the ONLY way to make use of the expression input.

OUTPUT VOLUME PEDAL has no settings. Toe-down, it's whatever level is set by your master level. Heel down it's silent. Any patches with this pedal in the chain will be immediately affected by whatever level the pedal is at. For example, if the pedal is heel down, all patches with this pedal in the chain will be silent as they load.

NOTE: All the other Pedal FX have a P before the first knob (see the FX List doc). This P knob value is the initial "pedal" value that is set when the patch is loaded. This is useful if we might not always have a pedal connected. Moving the pedal will immediately override the stored (knob) setting. Likewise, in "effect" (edit) mode, turning this first knob will temporarily override the current pedal position until the pedal is moved again.

PEDAL VOLUME has min/mix and curve A/B options-- funny how similar the letter A & B look in that display font. "A" curve increases more at the toe end (exponential), and "B" increases more at the heel end (convex).

The Bass Pedal Pitch is officially polyphonic, but it sounds pretty terrible. The Bass Pedal Mono Pitch is ok for changing the pitch of a sustaining note, especially with "Down" which just drops the pitch down to zero.

The selection and quality of the amp/cab combos is excellent. When they are called up, their default settings tend to be quite woofy and humpy in the lows. I did find that even with just the amp knobs, they can all be brought into a more sane spectrum. Additional fine-tuning can be done with an EQ module or two.
 
Another lil factoid (stop me if this is getting annoying!)

Dual Delay is the only stereo delay and it includes modulation. Time (A/B), Balance (wet/dry), Rep A/B (feedback) all work as expected. DEPTH adjusts modulation depth (0-50) for both mono (MN) and stereo (ST); so MN-0 thru MN50, then ST-0 thru ST50. If you have DEPTH set to stereo (STxx) then DLYMX crossfades between the two delay lines thusly:

at 0, it is all delay A in mono (regardless of DEPTH's stereo setting);
at 50, Delay A is panned hard left and Delay B is panned hard right;
at 100, it is all delay B in mono;
from 0 thru 50, it gradually widens the stereo, and
from 50 thru 100 it gradually narrows to mono.

It's a clever design: the more balanced the 2 delay lines are, the wider the stereo; as you reduce to either single delay line, it becomes more mono.

The speed of modulation is fixed, but it's a good choice of speed. No filtering.
 
Another lil factoid (stop me if this is getting annoying!)

Dual Delay is the only stereo delay and it includes modulation. Time (A/B), Balance (wet/dry), Rep A/B (feedback) all work as expected. DEPTH adjusts modulation depth (0-50) for both mono (MN) and stereo (ST); so MN-0 thru MN50, then ST-0 thru ST50. If you have DEPTH set to stereo (STxx) then DLYMX crossfades between the two delay lines thusly:

at 0, it is all delay A in mono (regardless of DEPTH's stereo setting);
at 50, Delay A is panned hard left and Delay B is panned hard right;
at 100, it is all delay B in mono;
from 0 thru 50, it gradually widens the stereo, and
from 50 thru 100 it gradually narrows to mono.

It's a clever design: the more balanced the 2 delay lines are, the wider the stereo; as you reduce to either single delay line, it becomes more mono.

The speed of modulation is fixed, but it's a good choice of speed. No filtering.

Not annoying, more info is always appreciated. I love the deep dives; I definitely get knowledge from your posts!
 
Any opinions on how the sounds compare to a B3 or MS-60B?

My current pedal board is the MS into the B3. I love it, but it's a bit bulky.

Plus, I like to get my always-on pedals (comp and amp sim) out of the way. That means putting them on the MS-60B. But because I'm using the B3 DI, that means my amp sim comes before most of my fx. I'm not crazy about that.

The B2 Four looks like it will solve this and take up less space. Are the effects and amps at least as good as the B3?
 
  • Like
Reactions: BrentSimons
There are only 5 slots in the B2 Four. In my limited experience (MS100-BT, and G3n), the compressors in the B2 Four are snappier, but with fewer controls/parameters. There are fewer amp selections, depending on what you need (clean vs dirt, etc), you might be ok. The tremolo in the B2 Four is quite limited and a little messed up. Otherwise the mod fx are fine.

Take a good long look at the B2 Four's FX List PDF from Zoom-- that'll give you an idea of what you gain & lose.
 
There are only 5 slots in the B2 Four. In my limited experience (MS100-BT, and G3n), the compressors in the B2 Four are snappier, but with fewer controls/parameters. There are fewer amp selections, depending on what you need (clean vs dirt, etc), you might be ok. The tremolo in the B2 Four is quite limited and a little messed up. Otherwise the mod fx are fine.

Take a good long look at the B2 Four's FX List PDF from Zoom-- that'll give you an idea of what you gain & lose.

Thanks. I've technically got seven slots in my chain now, though I can only switch four of them. I don't really use them all, so I think I'd be fine with five slots (with three switchable).

The FX I use most are vintage flanger, phaser, and fuzz. I occasionally need a synth bass sort of sound, but I can create custom patches for stuff like that. Amp-sim-wise I'm not super picky. So long it gives me a useable tone and functional eq, I can usually dial in what I want.

I guess my question isn't so much about what effects are available, but if the quality of those effects are generally as good or better than the B3. I can work around other limitations. But if the effects themselves aren't as good, I'll just stick with what I've got.
 
Last edited:
That being the case, I think you should make the switch. The synths are good.

You can see which fuzz models it has. I don't use fuzz much so I can't compare them. But if you want, I could bust out a little recording of a few modules. Just let me know.