• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Note Selection question in walking bass line

I love the flat-10th concept. 10th is easy to know as a 3rd uo the octave.
The majority of musicians prefer to use the following notation "Dominant 7 chord with #9". It clearly states that the chord is Major with one "intense" tension note - #9 added, while using the "flat 10th" notation brings some "confusion" for some musicians - "Is it a Major or Minor chord?"

The main reason why "flatted 10th" is a less useful designation for a chord name or chord symbol is because it violates the very precept that chord names/symbols were invented for:

Chord names/symbols were developed to be a form of shorthand that can easily convey the constituent pitch class components of a simultaneity without regard to register, and, at least in the post-figured bass world (aka, modern usage), without regard to voicing.

"C7#9" is completely register- and voicing-agnostic. There is nothing about that chord as written (there) to indicate what octaves any of the chord tones occur in, or how many times any of those chord tones could/should be doubled in different octaves, or what inversion it is played in. That's the point. If you wanted to be more specific about the register and voicing, you would write out a vertical simultaneity in standard musical notation.

Conversely, "C7b10" [sic] very specifically indicates that the note Eb is to be played in the register one octave above the root note C. I suppose that might be handy if that's exactly where you want the Eb to sound...but then what register should the Bb or the E natural be played? The "flatted 10th" chord symbol doesn't specify...so it's both incomplete, and unnecessarily restrictive at the same time.
 

Latest posts