TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
*Really* looking forward to getting my BB3. Hoping it arrives before my gig the 19th
View attachment 4861271
Apropos tweeter:Most who own a cabinet in the Big series would know this, but bringing it just in case.
The tweeter control isn't a level control. So raising or lowering the tweeter control doesn't raise or lower the volume of the upper mids and highs. It controls the crossover frequency, so it changes how much of the upper mids and highs get sent to the woofer and to the tweeter. It can indirectly affect the overall output level of higher frequencies, but there's more going on than just their volume level.
Not trying to talk down to anyone, just want to make sure the difference is clear if you weren't aware.
Apropos tweeter:
Sure I get that. But what confuses me is surely the SC enclosure is closer to the BB2 than the SM. So it is strange that the SM would make a better pairing with the BB2 than the SC...It's the enclosures that make the difference. Many commercial cabs are just speakers in a box. In the case of Barefaced the cabs are tuned to get a particular sound. That's why Alex thinks the SC doesn't work with the BB2 and the SM will work with either.
There's nothing to stop you running an SC and BB2, and you might like it, but in Alex's vision, they don't work together. If you think the sound is good then that's all that matters.
I run my tweeters on half as well. Just to get a little of that top end when I'm playing the Jazz.
PS There is a BB2 for sale on Basschat's For Sale section.
Sure I get that. But what confuses me is surely the SC enclosure is closer to the BB2 than the SM. So it is strange that the SM would make a better pairing with the BB2 than the SC...
Alex has written about the whys and wherefors in the past on this, but I am not going to go through pages to find it.Sure I get that. But what confuses me is surely the SC enclosure is closer to the BB2 than the SM. So it is strange that the SM would make a better pairing with the BB2 than the SC...
Super Midget is 17.5" 16.5" 11"Does anyone have any pictures of the top of a SM? I'm just wondering whether my RH750 head will overhang by some margin and be unstable
nice, but didnt Alex say a Supertwin paired with another Supertwin is not good for ones bowels?Not sure if this helps but here's a pic of a super twin on top of another super twin. Not gonna lie, it rules.
View attachment 4862065
Have you tried stacking them horizontally?Not sure if this helps but here's a pic of a super twin on top of another super twin. Not gonna lie, it rules.
View attachment 4862065
Oh Man! That sure would cover most gigs. I did an outdoor gig with just one ST with Traynor YBA-300. The cops came twice to turn us down due to complaints almost 1 mile away. They were hearing the Bass!Not sure if this helps but here's a pic of a super twin on top of another super twin. Not gonna lie, it rules.
View attachment 4862065
Personally I would not drill into my BB2. If you want a handle somewhere else. I would use strong Velcro or some adhesive.Has anyone attempted to put a handle on the other side of the BB2, to make it easier to carry/maneuver?
26948415[/URL], member: 241138"]Has anyone attempted to put a handle on the other side of the BB2, to make it easier to carry/maneuver?
Has anyone attempted to put a handle on the other side of the BB2, to make it easier to carry/maneuver?
Have you tried stacking them horizontally?