- Apr 21, 2000
- 10,465
- 866
- 60
- Disclosures
- Gallien Krueger for the last 12 years!
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
Think he knows?![]()
That someone photoshopped the picture? Probably not.Think he knows?![]()
I don't think it's a photoshop. Here's an article showing a different photo of the same sign. By the way, it's related to the Danish cartoon/Muhammad thing from last year.That someone photoshopped the picture? Probably not.
You are right - the first picture has a lot of photoshop hallmarks, but it may just be bad lighting or a quality reducting on the cut and paste. There is sufficient stories about this sign that indicate that it is real.I don't think it's a photoshop. Here's an article showing a different photo of the same sign. By the way, it's related to the Danish cartoon/Muhammad thing from last year.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/religion/Story/0,,1701518,00.html
No, its defintely from the cartoons - the photo was taken in the UK.Are you sure it's not from the recent Salman Rushdie contreversy?
I'll admit it is a pretty ironic picture out of context, but in context the sign does make sense.
Why would it make a difference? If it was the in the same context then it would also be ironic out of context and make sense in context.Would you be saying that if it was a Christian holding that sign?
Would you be saying that if it was a Christian holding that sign?
Why would it make a difference? If it was the in the same context then it would also be ironic out of context and make sense in context.
Well the sign is clearly referring to the argument that the cartoons in question were okay because they fall under "freedom of expression". Hence it makes sense to say that it can burn in hell (ie freedom of expression). If you actually read what I wrote - instead of what you thought I wrote - then you would see I never said it wasn't ironic, just that it makes sense in context.I don't see how it's any less ironic in context.![]()

Well the sign is clearly referring to the argument that the cartoons in question were okay because they fall under "freedom of expression". Hence it makes sense to say that it can burn in hell (ie freedom of expression). If you actually read what I wrote - instead of what you thought I wrote - then you would see I never said it wasn't ironic, just that it makes sense in context.