• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

One finger

No advantage at all... it's supposed to give a more even tone, but the difference is almost not noticeable... besides, if you play fast with one finger, chances are you're gonna do it with certain strength, which won't help in getting a wide range of dynamics
 
I've been using the one-finger RH technique for over 30 years. Why? 'Cause I didn't know any better. As a result I can play even fast string-crossing stuff no problem. Would I be a better bass player if I learned to play with two fingers? Probably, which I why I've been working on it. :)
 
I think it's called the James Jamerson technique. He was known for that and I think we all agree he was a "decent" bassist, no??
yes, but that's no reason others should do it. if james jamerson stuck his head in a fire, would you? ;)

yeah, there are times you might feel like one finger works better than two, but there's absolutely no advantage to using one finger only. jamerson was a super talent, but we're not jamerson.
 
Ever since I really started really locking in with rhythm sections, I haven't looked at my right hand in ages. If you're not naturally using your index for the same sound, then I'd say don't worry about it. Close your eyes, follow some grooves, and let your right hand do the talking.
 
i dont see much of an advantage to two over one though, honestly. if it was such a big advantage.. wouldnt you see "experts" using all four fingers?
you do. but even if some of them didn't, you'd still have to be crazy not to see the advantage of two over one. less work for the one finger, and playing fast is pretty much out of the question with only one. yeah, jamerson did it, but we ain't jamerson.
 

Latest posts