If for some reason you are sick of P bass threads and didn't read the title - stop now. 
As I've mentioned before, I'm a Jazz guy going through a talkbass inflicted case of P Bass GAS. The whole "P with Flats" thing has got to my head.
What I find most appealing about the P bass is actually not a feature of the P but something I find unappealing about the Jazz Bass market. There are way too many options. Active vs. Passive...Fender, Sadowsky, Lakland, etc. Yes I know there are active P basses, and the above companies make P inspired basses. However, I think most people would say that THE Precision sound is the sound of a passive precision with flats. When it comes to the Jazz, there are so many. Is the sound of a 60s Jazz with flats? A 70s jazz with a preamp? The geddy sound? The Jaco sound? I know I am painting this in broad strokes, and the same argument can probably be said for P basses. But I think the point is valid. If I bought a 62 reissue P bass, I think most would agree that I would have THE P sound. On the jazz side, if I bought a 62 Jazz and strung it with flats, I wouldn't really get the Jaco/Marcus/Geddy sound. With a Jazz, it seems like there is always more to get, more to tweak. Yes, 'Jazz Basses' in general are versatile, but I don't think any one jazz bass can achieve all those sounds. It's more that those sounds are all achieved with a different bass that happens to be a jazz bass. Make sense?
Overall, I guess, I just don't care for the active 'super' jazz bass sound. I tend to stray towards the vintage end and it seems like the purist form of that is just getting a P.
I'm curious who out there rocks a Jazz with flats and goes for that more vintage sound. I love the look of the 62 reissue jazz, but I feel like if I got it and put flats on it I would constantly be thinking that I might as well go all the way and just play a P.
As I've mentioned before, I'm a Jazz guy going through a talkbass inflicted case of P Bass GAS. The whole "P with Flats" thing has got to my head.
What I find most appealing about the P bass is actually not a feature of the P but something I find unappealing about the Jazz Bass market. There are way too many options. Active vs. Passive...Fender, Sadowsky, Lakland, etc. Yes I know there are active P basses, and the above companies make P inspired basses. However, I think most people would say that THE Precision sound is the sound of a passive precision with flats. When it comes to the Jazz, there are so many. Is the sound of a 60s Jazz with flats? A 70s jazz with a preamp? The geddy sound? The Jaco sound? I know I am painting this in broad strokes, and the same argument can probably be said for P basses. But I think the point is valid. If I bought a 62 reissue P bass, I think most would agree that I would have THE P sound. On the jazz side, if I bought a 62 Jazz and strung it with flats, I wouldn't really get the Jaco/Marcus/Geddy sound. With a Jazz, it seems like there is always more to get, more to tweak. Yes, 'Jazz Basses' in general are versatile, but I don't think any one jazz bass can achieve all those sounds. It's more that those sounds are all achieved with a different bass that happens to be a jazz bass. Make sense?
Overall, I guess, I just don't care for the active 'super' jazz bass sound. I tend to stray towards the vintage end and it seems like the purist form of that is just getting a P.
I'm curious who out there rocks a Jazz with flats and goes for that more vintage sound. I love the look of the 62 reissue jazz, but I feel like if I got it and put flats on it I would constantly be thinking that I might as well go all the way and just play a P.