(But I guess that's an American thing, if you compare it with cars, Europeans tend to keep them stock while Americans often start to change all kinds of things on them. it's a way to spend money, but you can wonder if there's serious improvement, or that that only happens between your ears, to justify the spending.)
Sure seems like. And I don’t get that at all. Anybody who’s super serious about changing the sound of their Hofner (although why even get something as iconic sounding as a Hofner if you’re going to do that?) can just plug it into a parametric EQ or install a preamp with a sweepable midrange control. Because there’s only so much you can do with a passive circuit. And the post mod differences are usually pretty subtle unless they’re correcting some bad design decision made by the manufacturer.
There’s also another factor in Sir Paul’s “secret sauce” that often is neglected. It’s called signal processing. Paul’s most famous sounds were studio recordings. So there’s always some tasteful compression and (I’d be willing to bet) a HPF rolling off some of the very low frequencies in the signal chain. Can’t speak for everyone, but I found using a HPF set to roll off below 35 or so hertz to clean up some of the inherent muddiness; and just enough compression to even out the signal a bit and add some emphasis to the attack (if you’re playing with a pick) works wonders with a Hofner or similar sounding bass. YMMV.