TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
Has a great neck!I happen to believe this one to be very overrated. It just has a generic sound that all of Jeff Berlin's basses seem to have and doesn't really stick out to me. I would put it among the least desirable of the Peavey basses, especially given the price of them now.
I happen to believe this one to be very overrated. It just has a generic sound that all of Jeff Berlin's basses seem to have and doesn't really stick out to me. I would put it among the least desirable of the Peavey basses, especially given the price of them now.
While I can appreciate your opinion, I'm guessing you missed the above from the OP as I simply brought up that it wasn't mentioned and nothing about how desirable it is or isn't. Thanks for your opinion though.For the Peavey fans out there, will you list your opinion of the Peavey bass models throughout their years of production, from the most desirable model to the least desirable model. Please include basses from all countries of manufacture..
While I can appreciate your opinion, I'm guessing you missed the above from the OP as I simply brought up that it wasn't mentioned and nothing about how desirable it is or isn't. Thanks for your opinion though.
Yeah, he must mean the import Milly's. I have a USA 5-string and I replaced the pickups with the same Barts used in older model Lakland 55-02's so I could split the MM.Were you playing American or import Millenniums? I always wished that big humbucker had either been splittable or in the actual Stingray position, but I thought they were very well made basses.
For the Peavey fans out there, will you list your opinion of the Peavey bass models throughout their years of production, from the most desirable model to the least desirable model. Please include basses from all countries of manufacture, without regard to current price or market value. I won't offer my opinion since I don't want to skew the results.
I will say that I have two Peavey basses and several Peavey guitars in my collection. I also have several Peavey amps and sound gear, so I am a fan, but for this thread let's just talk about their basses.
Thanks in advance,
Thump on,
One_Dude
Indo made Cirrus neck through.I'd like to try a USA Cirrus some day. They seem to have been built with a pretty wide variety of wood combos. Having no woods preference, I guess one with a figured redwood (Spanish cedar?) top might what I'd spring for, based solely on its looks. Pretty sure I'd like how they'd sound.
$300 is a fair price they may "creep up" and definitely gain some value but IMO I don't think they will "skyrocket" in value.I'm considering getting a mid ninties Fury for about $300 usd. There don't seem to be many around these days. I'm wondering if the price of the Furys might skyrocket in the next decade or so, like the T-40s have.
Both great basses, but keep in mind the Fury has a thinner Jazz neck profile and a nut width of 1.5" vs. the Squier 50's P has a fatter 1.685" nut (almost 43mm).Thats probably fair. Im on fence between buying the fury, or a used squier 50s pbass with an upgraded Seymour Duncan PUP.