I can't but think about the pushback that so many have expressed at the reintroduction of Tobias basses by Gibson. A lot of people sounded like they wanted American basses made just they were back in the day with the same prices as back in the day.
A new Cirrus that is made in Czechia and costing the same as a Euro Spector (why wouldn't it cost the same) is going to face blowback by people pointing to used Mississippi Cirri that are half the price.
Are these new ones made in Czechia or Mississippi?
To be clear, I don't expect them to be the exact same price as back in the day, I just think that $5,000 MSRP is a tough sell.
However, I also concede that $3,700 is much closer to where comparable offerings are now than I anticipated! I cited Carvin as an example in my previous post. In Kiesel's "Builder" on their website, I just optioned out an Icon bass to be as close to the Cirrus as I could get it - translucent blue flame maple top on an alder body with a paint-matched seven-piece maple neck and headstock, rosewood board with a 12th fret MOP inlay, 24 medium jumbo frets, black hardware and it was...
uh... let's see... carry the one... uhhhh...
$3,700.
So, I could just be out of touch with the market!
I do think, however, that Peavey does this weird thing with bass players where they don't release much of anything for bass gear for many years and then absolutely blitz with a bunch of high-end gear in what I consider an attempt to re-energize the market, only to be met with "man, I'm not paying that much for a Peavey" and leave the market once more. Kiesel/Carvin, in contrast, has been making the same instruments in the same way for decades.
And, to be clear, I am emphatically not a Peavey hater - I have several of their amps which I absolutely love and plan to keep for recording duty if nothing else, and I still lust after a Cirrus I played at a used guitar store when I was in high school. I just wonder who their new bass gear is for at the prices they're asking.