My biggest peeve is single-cut bass bodies. Dunno why. I don't mind them on guitars.
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
He does have a right to an opinion. Dissagree but don't deny.You've already stated your hatred for my favorite so I'll spare you the angst.
I feel the same way about the oval Lakland bridge, it bugs me a whole lot more than it should!I understand many of your comments, agree with most/many but you left off one that bugs me and is not commented openly on this site and that is the G&L headstock with that pointy bit sticking downward like a drop tine.
It is displeasing enough that I would never buy one no matter how good the bass actually was, nor how inexpensive.
As someone with some graphic design background I agree with just about everything you said. I fell in love with the Precision shape as a teenager back in the 1960s. There are some basses I just could not own due to what I see as unattractive heads, bodies, pick-guards and colours.I know this is a very trivial thing for most people and we all have different ideas about what we like/dislike in the looks of our bass.
As an artist, I love the shapes/designs of a lot of basses and some I have a strong dislike and as petty as it might be, there are some basses that I really like visually, but the shape/color of the pickguard either flows with the curves of the body or it (IMO) ruins the looks.
I love the classic Precision/Jazz pickguards. But...I really hate the '51 Precision pickguard (what's with the need for it on the upper horn? and why does the other end have a control plate that doesn't flow into anything?). I like the MM Sting Ray guard, but hate the Sterling pickguard shape. I also dislike the toilet seat body shape of the Bongo. I prefer the body shape of a Precision over the droopy Jazz body. I also dislike the short upper horns of Mustangs and Jaguars. Why is the upper horn so short?
Most are all excellent basses, but visually there just some bass body and pickguard shapes that turn me off visually. I also understand that others either don't care of really love them. To each his own, obviously. Don't take my opinion personally...just a quirk of mine. I'm more interested in what others' favorite shapes/designs are.
I either prefer no pickguard (especially on natural finishes) or a pickguard the flows with the body shape, like the eternally classic Precision pickguard change in 1957 to today...
Discuss...
What are some of your favorite body and/or pickguard shapes?
![]()
Do you see any kind of wear long term without one? I mean a daily player.The one and only bass that I've had with a pickguard was my very first bass.
A Pre Ernie Ball Musicman Sabre.
And I took that pickguard off immediately!
I asked myself"Why does a bass need a pickguard?Most who do use a pick don't get really wild and scratch the surface"
So from then on every single bass I bought had no pickguard.
Me too! I don't know why but I really don't like those...I feel the same way about the oval Lakland bridge, it bugs me a whole lot more than it should!
I never used to like colors. For 45 years, I always liked either natural wood finishes, sunburst or basic black. Until I got my new Squier P/J in Lake Placid Blue. Even then it had to grow on me. Now? LOL.
![]()
![]()
No.Do you see any kind of wear long term without one? I mean a daily player.
That’s the funny thing with preferences, I love the design and wood on that top bass… but the asymmetric pole pieces on the pickups would annoy the heck out of me!!! See also those oval Delano pickups and Lakland bridges.I think pickguards look good on some basses, but on most, and esepcially on good looking wood, I prefer no pickguard.View attachment 7271429View attachment 7271448
Never said he didn't. You'll find few on TB with a more "you do you" take than me.He does have a right to an opinion. Dissagree but don't deny.
Nothing worse than this, I think.
Seriously, absolutely no thought went into the missing bottom half.
View attachment 7271533
I didn't start this thread to get anyone riled up, and glad it hasn't turned into that because that was never my intent. I'm just interested in what people like/dislike.What's interesting about an opinion is that it will never be a single opinion by one person. Many others will share that thaught and yet the internet police will scold you for having that opinion.
There is no such thing as Robinson Caruso. You are never alone with your opinion.
A negative opinion is often more valuable than a positive opinion because it takes thaught, deliberation and acceptance before you actually post it. It's never as flippant as a positive comment can be.
I understand many of your comments, agree with most/many but you left off one that bugs me and is not commented openly on this site and that is the G&L headstock with that pointy bit sticking downward like a drop tine.
It is displeasing enough that I would never buy one no matter how good the bass actually was, nor how inexpensive.
Thanks for the post. Asthetics matter and are in the eye of the beholder, who has a wallet in his back pocket.
He does have a right to an opinion. Dissagree but don't deny.
Yeah...me too. It just doesn't fit, and seems out of place with the rest of the bass design.I feel the same way about the oval Lakland bridge, it bugs me a whole lot more than it should!