My Kali IN8 monitors arrived last week, replacing the Rokits. They're very good, and I'll be surprised if I ever need to upgrade from them.
I was concerned about putting 8" drivers into a room that's already boomy with 6" ones, but this hasn't been a problem at all. Either there are some very precisely-placed nodes in here, or these monitors are doing something radically different. At a guess, the Rokits were over-emphasising the lows, and these are much more precise.
First thought was actually "where'd the bass go?" followed by the slowly-dawning realisation that I was hearing all of it for the first time. I'm actually still adjusting to the idea of hearing this much detail all the way down to a low E.
So I can affirm the comment by @Hiroler79 about the low-end not being as accurate as it could be on the Rokits. I withdraw my endorsement of those, now that I've heard how much better a monitor can sound.
Two things in particular impressed me about the approach of Kali's engineers. One was that these monitors are designed to go up to 85dB with some headroom for transient peaks, on the basis that only an idiot monitors louder than that.
The other was their response to my email asking whether these needed a breaking-in period. The Rokits definitely benefitted from it and this was stated in the manual, but the Kali manual said nothing either way. I got a concise but thorough explanation about their testing methodology, and that they'd seen no significant difference in response between the before-testing and after-testing frequency response.