I remember seeing a megathread arguing about that now that you mention it. Let me rephrase, the K2 is class D, with the output transistors either at full rail voltage, or 0, call it binary? Non-linear? The output transistors operate digital-ish-ally, producing a pulse width modulated square wave, which after summing/smoothing (with capacitors?) creates a good approximation of an analog audio waveform. Something like that.
My intention wasn't to badmouth my QSC amp, I remembered seeing the 8 and 4 ohm stereo and 8 ohm bridged ratings were @.1%THD, 20-20kHz, but stereo 2 ohm and bridged 4 ohm listed at the less restrictive 1%THD 1kHz rating. It was spelled out in the manual, no attempt to hide anything or deceive on the part of QSC.
I brought it up to illustrate the different ways to rate a power amp, and to be careful to doublecheck, if B'ger will steal other companies designs, they're not above telling you its 2400Watts, but not mention its the "inflated" 1% 1kHz value, so you don't realize you're comparing their "road apples" to your oranges. Its like saying something is worth $100 but not mentioning whether its US or CDN....
I was suspicious of potential "overrating" because it was getting close to the limit of power you can get out of a std circuit. That's where the whole efficiency point came in, in this case the class D K2 might put out a continuous 2400 W where the less efficient class AB B'ger couldn't, it could push the current requirements for the amp beyond what even a 30 amp service can produce.
You're right, it might pop the breaker if you tried to run full blast continuously, but I was thinking the alternative, that it actually would run full blast on a 20 or 30 amp service, but only because the 2400 W rating was overly "optimistic" and maybe even inflated on the B'ger.
Randy