This is just a question out of curiosity and a desire to better understand more so than any practical need to know the answers. Sorry for the length of this rambling post, it includes several examples in an attempt to explain and understand the relationship between power output and load impedance.
Manufacturers of solid state amps will often provide power output ratings at two (and sometimes) three different load impedances, but there is no one consistent “scale factor” which applies across all amps relating how much the power changes as the impedance changes.
In some cases, such as the Ampeg RB series (class D), the power output is halved when the impedance is doubled. Is it correct to say that this suggests the amplifier’s output voltage remains constant regardless of load impedance, so the power simply scales inversely with the impedance? Or perhaps are there many other factors, all of which vary, and the net effect coincidentally works out to this simple inverse ratio?
In other cases, such as the Fender Rumble series (also class D), the power output decreases by 1.4 times when the impedance is doubled. This seems to suggest that the output voltage does not remain constant for varying impedances. Is this the inherent nature of a particular type of power amp? Are there specific choices made by the designer which could alter the 1.4 scale factor to some other number like 1.2 or 1.7 and are there inherent limits?
Finally, there are some manufacturers who provide the power output at three different impedances and there doesn’t seem to be much consistency in how the power output varies with varying impedances here either. Some, like the Vox MV series of class D mini guitar heads, behave like the Ampeg RB series in that the power halves for each doubling of impedance (50, 25, and 12.5 W at 4, 8, and 16 ohms). Others like the Marshall 2195 guitar and bass head from the late 1970s reduce power not quite in half for each doubling of impedance (from 100, 65, 36 W at 4, 8, and 16 ohms). Yet others like the Peavey TKO 65 from the early 1980s output maximum power at 8 ohms with reductions at 4 ohms and 16 ohms (50, 70, and 40 W at 4, 8, and 16 ohms). Does this suggest some form of current limiting to maintain safe operation at the lowest impedance level?
I’d be curious to get input from those more knowledgeable than myself as I try to understand why there are so many differences in the relationship between output power and load impedance.
Manufacturers of solid state amps will often provide power output ratings at two (and sometimes) three different load impedances, but there is no one consistent “scale factor” which applies across all amps relating how much the power changes as the impedance changes.
In some cases, such as the Ampeg RB series (class D), the power output is halved when the impedance is doubled. Is it correct to say that this suggests the amplifier’s output voltage remains constant regardless of load impedance, so the power simply scales inversely with the impedance? Or perhaps are there many other factors, all of which vary, and the net effect coincidentally works out to this simple inverse ratio?
In other cases, such as the Fender Rumble series (also class D), the power output decreases by 1.4 times when the impedance is doubled. This seems to suggest that the output voltage does not remain constant for varying impedances. Is this the inherent nature of a particular type of power amp? Are there specific choices made by the designer which could alter the 1.4 scale factor to some other number like 1.2 or 1.7 and are there inherent limits?
Finally, there are some manufacturers who provide the power output at three different impedances and there doesn’t seem to be much consistency in how the power output varies with varying impedances here either. Some, like the Vox MV series of class D mini guitar heads, behave like the Ampeg RB series in that the power halves for each doubling of impedance (50, 25, and 12.5 W at 4, 8, and 16 ohms). Others like the Marshall 2195 guitar and bass head from the late 1970s reduce power not quite in half for each doubling of impedance (from 100, 65, 36 W at 4, 8, and 16 ohms). Yet others like the Peavey TKO 65 from the early 1980s output maximum power at 8 ohms with reductions at 4 ohms and 16 ohms (50, 70, and 40 W at 4, 8, and 16 ohms). Does this suggest some form of current limiting to maintain safe operation at the lowest impedance level?
I’d be curious to get input from those more knowledgeable than myself as I try to understand why there are so many differences in the relationship between output power and load impedance.