"Value" is subjective.
Exactly. Hence the poll, to find the bulk of peoples price vs quality.
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
"Value" is subjective.
It doesn't work that way, there are no specific $$$ related benchmarks. YMMV
I personally find that there are. Its just different for each person.
But are you buying a $5000 bass because you feel you have to, to prevent problems, OR because the bass with the sound, feel and looks you want happens to cost 5k?I have basses over and under $1000 CND.
I love them all in their own ways. If I want a bass for $5000 and it's personally worth it to me, I'll save up and get it. Boom, value!
I voted $300.
A new Squier VM or Classic Vibe bass or SUB 4 is probably on the bottom line of the scale for "nice" basses.
But are you buying a $5000 bass because you feel you have to, to prevent problems, OR because the bass with the sound, feel and looks you want happens to cost 5k?
This is a discussion forum for a specific class of instruments used in making music. Absolutely everything here is subjective.
Not saying they are not better. I definitely agree, hence why an NS-2 is on my GAS list. But were looking at the opposite end of the spectrum her. Rather than looking for something great we are looking for cheep but "good enough for the price."Take it from me. They're better in every way... Except how they effect your bank account.
But are you buying a $5000 bass because you feel you have to, to prevent problems, OR because the bass with the sound, feel and looks you want happens to cost 5k?
My main players were all $250 or less. Cheap stuff works for me, and that's all that matters to me. I'm happy with what I've got, and none of the more expensive basses that I've noodled with in GC have made me want to replace mine with something more expensive. I'm probably just cheap and have cheap tastes, but I'm happy.
I cannot really participate in the poll. My main players were all $250 or less. But I'm not a pro. The only place I play out is my church, most Sundays. The only "issues" I have experienced have been a string height screw that got kinda rounded (but with the right adjustment technique, I have avoided all additional problems of that type), some gnarly string guides that I replaced, and one P pup that was miswired (easily fixed). But my basses have been reliable (most of my main players are passive) and give me tone that I like. The wood is solid, the neck, pups and bridge align well enough for me to get decent string balance and they hold tune. I have been able to get reasonable setups on all of them and have only had to do fret levels on about 3 (out of 25) of my cheap basses, but then I am not one of those who wants their strings almost touching the frets (I like a more tactile fretting experience).
Cheap stuff works for me, and that's all that matters to me. Are more expensive basses better than what I have? Probably, but I'm happy with what I've got, and none of the more expensive basses that I've noodled with in GC have made me want to replace mine with something more expensive. I'm probably just cheap and have cheap tastes, but I'm happy.
Sure you can participate. Just look at it like this: you spent 250 on those basses and had those easy to fix issues. what if those basses cost 300, would it still be ok? What if they cost 400 and still had those problems? 500 with problems? See where I'm going with it. At what price is that mis-wired pickup unacceptable?
I was wondering when someone was finally going to address this topic....today.![]()