billfitzmaurice
Commercial User
- Sep 15, 2004
- 16,860
- 278
- 76
- Disclosures
- Owner, Bill Fitzmaurice Loudspeaker Design
It would. Did you read the design intent?René_Julien;10798963 said:I saw a guitar cab designs from Bill Fitzmaurice on his website: toe'd in and "kick backed" cab designs for 2x10, 4x10, 2x12 and 4x12 cabs.
Wouldn't vertical array...be better?
guitar cabs have very narrow dispersion in the mid and high frequencies. To compound matters theyre usually placed on the floor just a few feet in back of the player, so those directional frequencies pass around knee level. Even worse, to look right beneath an amplifier thats 20 to 24 inches wide, dual driver cabs place their drivers horizontally. This narrows the horizontal dispersion angle even more, and causes comb filtering in the highs. In an audio engineering course on how not to build a speaker the typical electric guitar cabinet would be around the top of the list.
The simple solution is to vertically array the drivers, which would widen horizontal dispersion, eliminate combing and put the source closer to the players ear level, but the resulting tall, thin cabinet would look funny with the amplifier overhanging both sides. Guitar players themselves have never had a problem with looking funny, but they do draw the line when it comes to how their gear looks. Enter Plan B: the cross-firing XF guitar speaker.
The same physics apply to bass cabs. But cross-firing drivers reduces the cabinet volume, which reduces bass response, so I don't offer an XF bass cab. Besides, the larger internal volume required for bass drivers makes a skinny cab unnecessary anyway; the narrowest I do is 20 inches, even loaded with tens.
Yes, so long as the two cabs are stacked above one another, which keeps the overall acoustic footprint as narrow as possible.but bill has said that you can aim cabs crossing the stage in a 45 degree angle to get better dispersion.