Our singer recently put up a FB post along the lines of “Rare night off. Went to {venue} to check out {not my band}. What a great show. Definitely check them out if you get a chance.” With a photo and link to their page.
Now our guitarist had a bit of a rant about promoting the “opposition”. This is in small-town cover-band land, where we’re all competing for a dwindling number of venues, but I’m on the side of our singer. Promoting live music on the whole is good for everyone. More people checking out bands at venues, means more venues putting on bands, means more gigs for everyone. It’s the flip side of Dad-Bands playing rubbish blues for free is dragging down the image for everyone.
Discuss……
Okay, my area is very saturated and concentrated with some really good competing bands, directly competing with mine for the same venues and talent buyers. So that kind of internet free promo for a band I am in direct competition with in my area would not go over well with me.
I would never diss on a competing band, but I have no intention of giving them a free boost up the ladder.
However, we make it a point to announce the next week's live entertainment everywhere we play. But that is mainly to promote the venue (and curry their favor), not the band.
Yeah, promoting "live music" in general is a good idea, but in specific (promoting other bands), at the possible expense of your own livelihood, is suicide. It's not necessary. Singer could have quashed that sentiment and everything would have been just fine. No one would have leveled any criticism. Let the other bands drum up their own buzz under their own volition.
Last edited: