I am increasingly frustrated with my current extension which replaced an extension from Dawson which also had issues.
Having owned extensions made by Hachez, Threlkeld, Dawson, Martin (one Fawcett and one with basscapos) and having seen and played a large variety of extensions I would like to get an idea of the pros and cons of all the extensions out there.
Shipping my bass to the US just to get an extension is a bit much, but a friend of mine in a London Orchestra did just that. He was fortunate enough to combine it with a US tour he was doing and also had other work done at Robertsons.
I will be changing out the Hill extension again and maybe adding one to my new bass currently being made.
Here is my take on what I have owned.
Hachez:
Beautiful Rosewood on one and ebony on the other.
Slim design that suited the bass
Nicely angled Surface, increasing towards the C
Stops always closed correctly, never under the string
Low maintenance
Nice solid tunable C nut
Only con is that it was not tunable other than the C.
Old model neded the leather pad changed every 5-10 years
That is now a non issue AFAIK.
Threllkeld was same as above, but ebony. Classic Robertsons design
This was while he was at Robertsons still.
Dawson
clunky
flat Surface, overly wide
Stops sound good, but tend to rattle and you quickly change tuning as the sleeve gets dented over time.
not tunable
Metal low c nut that is sort of tunable, can rattle
Can go under the string if not careful
Martin with basscapos
clunky, but better than Dawson
flat Surface
tunable C, but it broke after a few years
tunable sort of
E tends to be high maintenace and quickly is unable to stop string properly on very powerful basses. On my Hill, first page of Romeo and Juliet always requires a check after every E as it works itself open.
even when tightened.
stop can go under string, but not as easily as the dawson
I am limiting myself to the ones I have first hand experience with as an owner.
Please help me add to this list
Having owned extensions made by Hachez, Threlkeld, Dawson, Martin (one Fawcett and one with basscapos) and having seen and played a large variety of extensions I would like to get an idea of the pros and cons of all the extensions out there.
Shipping my bass to the US just to get an extension is a bit much, but a friend of mine in a London Orchestra did just that. He was fortunate enough to combine it with a US tour he was doing and also had other work done at Robertsons.
I will be changing out the Hill extension again and maybe adding one to my new bass currently being made.
Here is my take on what I have owned.
Hachez:
Beautiful Rosewood on one and ebony on the other.
Slim design that suited the bass
Nicely angled Surface, increasing towards the C
Stops always closed correctly, never under the string
Low maintenance
Nice solid tunable C nut
Only con is that it was not tunable other than the C.
Old model neded the leather pad changed every 5-10 years
That is now a non issue AFAIK.
Threllkeld was same as above, but ebony. Classic Robertsons design
This was while he was at Robertsons still.
Dawson
clunky
flat Surface, overly wide
Stops sound good, but tend to rattle and you quickly change tuning as the sleeve gets dented over time.
not tunable
Metal low c nut that is sort of tunable, can rattle
Can go under the string if not careful
Martin with basscapos
clunky, but better than Dawson
flat Surface
tunable C, but it broke after a few years
tunable sort of
E tends to be high maintenace and quickly is unable to stop string properly on very powerful basses. On my Hill, first page of Romeo and Juliet always requires a check after every E as it works itself open.
even when tightened.
stop can go under string, but not as easily as the dawson
I am limiting myself to the ones I have first hand experience with as an owner.
Please help me add to this list
Last edited: