makes sense to me. wouldn't a bigger magnet require more power to activate it?
It's a magnet. You don't "activate" it, it just sits there and does its thing.
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
makes sense to me. wouldn't a bigger magnet require more power to activate it?
+1 me neitherI have every confidence BFM knows what he's talking about, but that makes no sense whatsoever to me.
a bigger magnet makes for a more sensitive speaker, so it would do more with less input.makes sense to me. wouldn't a bigger magnet require more power to activate it?
ok, that implies that the cab is less sensitive, which i'm pretty sure means that the cones are stiffer and heavier, and/or the gap in the magnet that the voice coil moves through is wider. both of these make the speaker able to take more power and abuse, but they end up needing that power to "wake up" properly.thanks for all the input guys. the head is underpowering i can tell a little. for some reason it does not feel as powerfull as it was before; for example in practice studio there was no way i could put the volume up to 5 with my old cab. now with the basson i can put it up to 5 and doesnt feel as powerful.
i'd take a used QSC over a new b'ger any day.i think i am just going to upgrade and buy a power amp, and a pre amp seperately. any opinions in these right here:
Invalid Link Removed
or
Invalid Link Removed
ask bill. i can only give you the dumb guy version.ok, that implies that the cab is less sensitive, which i'm pretty sure means that the cones are stiffer and heavier, and/or the gap in the magnet that the voice coil moves through is wider. both of these make the speaker able to take more power and abuse, but they end up needing that power to "wake up" properly.
i still don't get the "minimum power" thing.
what about crown vs QSC?