Jamie's probably the best person to answer this but I'll give it a try.
This is actually the first "Warwick" I have owned, or played much to be honest. I've played a few in stores and at shows when other guys had them out. The original neck on my Buzzard was a fretless with an unlined ebony board. It had the traditional Warwick headstock and it was an ovangkol neck. To my hands, it really didn't feel as thick as the other Warwick's I had played. The thing I really loved about the original neck was that it had a taper to it as your hand moved along the back of the neck up into the higher register. It kind of flattened out as you went up. This made for an amazingly comfortable feel.
When I first consulted with Jamie about constructing a custom, fretted neck, I made him aware that I really enjoyed this feel and would like to have it copied, exactly, on the new neck. Jamie was able to get the radius, and the back contour perfecton the custom neck. The only difference is, the new, custom neck feels a tad thinner from front to back. It's almost unnoticeable. The reason this was done (correct me if I'm wrong Jamie) was to compensate for the added dimension of the frets. All in all, it feels, to my hands, exactly the same as the original neck, except with frets added.
This is truly an amazing instrument, one I don't think I'll ever be made to part with.
If anyone's in or around the Dallas area, feel free to look me up if you'd like to see her. She's a beauty and I'm very, very proud of her.
Worshiper said:
so now is that neck as thick as a standard warwick?