Yep, it doesn't really matter. But the big paying gigs generally call readers up.
Agreed- if that is what someone is looking for its a very good thing lol
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
Yep, it doesn't really matter. But the big paying gigs generally call readers up.
Knowledge is not elitist. That is all.
Pino Palladino. So reading is obviously useless.Like I said, trot out the bassist equivalent of Dennis Chambers.
How can you disagree? Of course it is! Just because you say my opinion isn't fact doesn't mean it isn't![]()
I disagree IMHO
mbeall said:So in effect you are arguing that:
"lack of skill" > "skill"
Are you serious?
And you are arguing that:
Being able to read music = skill?
Are you serious?
And you are arguing that:
Being able to read music = skill?
Are you serious?
Febs said:Are you seriously arguing that it's not a skill?
TNCreature said:There is nothing elitist about reading music. It makes a musician more literate. And yes, there are some very few exceptions (prodigies, etc)
However, some in this thread are exhibiting their elitism.
So maybe there is a little understanding on where that perception could come from. I say could, because I also believe on the other side of the coin are the pridefully ingnorant who are defensive.
I don't read well. I would like to get better at it. I am not session player. I have fun when I do play.
So, be at peace with your choice, take pride in your achievements, and don't let it spoil yer day.
No. Arguing that there are great musicians on both sides.
The only people who argue against reading music are those who can't do it. That pretty much ends the debate, as far as I'm concerned.