+1 to everything above. There is no 'right' way.
2 points
1. The best mics and pickups in the hands of an engineer that doesn't know how to mix a DB ain't gonna matter. I had a guy get a great sound on a pop recording I did by just using some AKG kick mic. Point is it is the ears not the gear.
2. The fun part about the less is more approach is it puts more onus on the performers. The engineer can't do as much in mixdown so everything has to be on in the session.
hell yeah, man. that is absolutely the right attitude to have. and as an engineer who considers himself a musician first, I really appreciate people like you when I'm in the studio.
I've only been playing bass for about 1.5 years, but I've been recording for probably... 9 or so. and playing music (trombone) for 16. anyway. in the studio, particularly a well-equipped studio with good acoustics (and possibly an iso booth, or at least some serious baffles), I would never bother with a pickup. heck, as long as I can get some healthy level without the drums interfering, the idea of a pickup won't even enter my mind!
recording live, however... that's another matter entirely.
in my experience as an engineer, upright bass is the most difficult thing to mic live. a good condenser mic sounds beautiful, but the amount of bleed from the drums usually makes it unusable, except on solos. and I've recorded christian mcbride at the blue note; even a dude with that much sound and projection, we couldn't use our main condenser mic for most of the sound. there are baffles and such that you can use (like the reflexion filter), but the two things that saved us on that recording were 1. the pickup signal and 2. a tiny-diaphragm condenser (sm98) stuffed in the f-hole. usually sounds like ****, but at least it's better than "30% bass / 70% drums."
again, haven't been playing bass that long, relatively speaking, but the best PICKUP that I have heard (as an engineer) is the realist. most of the others are pretty awful. (especially that dang fishman.)