Sweet bass. I vote to leave as is - or "refloat" as Turnaround suggested if the finish is nitro.
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
Interestingly enough, quite recently I've seen relics mimicing a bad refinish: a solid colour with scratches and wear showing the supposedly original sunburst underneath. A proper luthier would sand off the original finish until it's bare, and then apply the new finish. Of course, not all luthiers in the past were willing to do that (it's a terrible job, my luthier is currently working on a Jazz bass of mine and he complains every week about it lol). The idea that the world of relic enthusiasts is now embracing bad refinishes, gives me the idea that vintage refinished Fender's will increase in price soon.
[Invalid or Expired Link Removed]
Can you quantify that, and put number on it, thanks?...that would be worth a crap ton...

Can you quantify that, and put number on it, thanks?![]()
![]()
Unfortunately, say around 2000, when a picture of something like that came up online people would be frothing. Just losing their minds. Now there are so many relic versions the real thing Almost isn't as cool, you get desensitized and lose that "urgency" you might have felt seeing an original. Or at least I kinda did.


I agree with Pedullist. "Vintage" and "relic" are getting out of hand. Do what you want, based on whether it bothers you or not (visually and "feel-wise"). That is one cool bass!Well...yes....thanks for the info, it just increases the utter nonsense level of the vintage (and relic) world to me.
So it was a cheap solution for a cheap factory built assemblage bass...something people would never accept from a luthier these days on top of that....and people are willing to pay ridiculous prices for it. Great. And then, they mimic that procedure for new basses and ask ridiculous prices for that too.
Sorry for hijacking your thread, Bruce. I'll leave it at this. My answer would be YES (if it bothers you whilst playing) and NO (if it doesn't bother ya). Instruments need to be played.
Hello;
Trying to post photos now but don't know! how are these? Worst part is there are two cracks in the finish that run the length go the neck! It is still playable but can be felt! Stayed in tune since yesterday.
View attachment 1182584View attachment 1182585View attachment 2617096View attachment 2617097[/QUOT
Hello;
Well, I have had this Doug Irwin bass since the 70's. ( made for me by him) Got it out the other day to look it over and play it, to find that over the years the finish has "checked" (fine lines, cracking all over). So I am asking any members here who "are in the know", should I re-finish this "one of a kind" bass or not! It Plays just fine but really shows it's age!!!
Also found out that the HI A Pickups on this bass are Super Rare!!!!
Give me some feedback, YES, or NO! (on the re-finish)[/Q
Don't touch it, just play it. I think a Refin would make it less desirable. Keep it origional like it was intended. What does the maker think?