• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Double Bass Removing a fingerboard

I need to take the fingerboard off my EUB project. I used hide glue to attach it. I tried the method in Traeger's book using a knife and I tried a heated blade. Nothing seems to work. The neck is starting to split at a 20 degree angle instead of the fingerboard comming off. I've got about 2 inches off on the nut side and about 4 off on the bridge side. The neck is trying to split on both sides. Any suggestions?
 
Was this Hide Glue cooked fresh you used or Franklins Liquid Hide Glue? Was the neck and FB scored before gluing?

The kind of glue you used and the method may also make it harder to remove.

Like Nick mentions, the Iron is a good way to go. Don't force it. The neck, as Jeff is hinting is a major job to fix as compared to the FB.
 
Many people believe that scoring makes "tendrils" in the joint and gives it more integrity. Simply not true. Scoring the board would actually aid in getting it off later. Some boards have a channel cut down the underside (glue joint side) to aid in removal.
 
I have heard some say to glue along the edges and let the clamping spread the glue towards the center of the board.

Personally, I prefer to use several hot knifes (heating them in a pot of boiling water and rotating which one is used) and a syringe of said water. Once the knife is in, it wedges the board and the neck apart. At the leading end of this gap is where to place your syringe (being careful not leave pools of water around to mess with your wood). As always, patience is the key ingredient
 
nicklloyd said:
Many people believe that scoring makes "tendrils" in the joint and gives it more integrity. Simply not true. Scoring the board would actually aid in getting it off later. Some boards have a channel cut down the underside (glue joint side) to aid in removal.
Now see, I always thought that was done to allow the glue room to pool so as not have the pressure of glue build up and force the joint open. some factory POS instruments are so hollowed out under the board it's a wonder they stay put as long as they do.

This practice is junk work IMO though...no one does this to center seams and they do just fine. :)
 
nicklloyd said:
Many people believe that scoring makes "tendrils" in the joint and gives it more integrity. Simply not true. Scoring the board would actually aid in getting it off later. Some boards have a channel cut down the underside (glue joint side) to aid in removal.
True with the electro-chemical bond of hide glue but untrue with other glues. Many glues like epoxy and cyannos use mechanical bonds and the "tendril or fingers" concept does work. I believe that many luthiers who put the center channel did it to allow the excess glue a place to flow in or to. Not needed as you guys know. It may have arisen do to people not working quickly enuf and having the glue gell.
 
uprightbassghos said:
Thanks for all the replies. The hot knives did not seem to cooperate. I did not want to steam it since the neck itself is 3 pieces of maple glued the same way. I ended up cutting it off by sawing 1 inch segments which pried off pretty easily. The new fingerboard is on and I'm re-shaping the neck now. (Other prototype [Invalid or Expired Link Removed])
That proto looks cool, did you make it?
 
Sorry to hi-jack this thread, but it is a related query.

Has anyone ever had to resort to routing a fingerboard off the neck?-as in the type of machine, a router-

I've just been told by my luthier that he is almost certain my fingerboard has been glued on with white glue.

The board isn't due for replacement for a while yet (maybe a year or so) but when it is i don't know if i can stump for the added cost in luthier hours of having him cut as much of the board off parallel to the glue seam, then planing whats left off back to the neck.


This seems like the most sensible approach but are there alternatives?

any thoughts would be gratefully recieved.

thanks
thomas
 
A power hand planer is my preferred method for removing fingerboards that you don't want to salvage. It's quick, accurate, and easy to control. Much better than trying to remove the board and crack the neck.

A router has a smaller cutting area, requiring more time, and you would probably have to make some kind of jig... more time as well.
 
What about using the power hand planer for a board that you only partly, sort-of want to salvage??

My situation is this: I have an old Kay that I'm working on rehabilitating... Someone previously tried to take off the maple fingerboard and started some cracks near the nut (similar to what the original author of this post described).

I'd like to glue that entire area back together, then plane the entire old fingerboard into a long, tapered shim (in order to raise the overstand and height of the bridge). Would a power hand planer be advisable, at least for the beginning stages of turning the old fingerboard into a shim???

Thanks in advance for any advice!

Paul O'Connell
Toronto

nicklloyd said:
A power hand planer is my preferred method for removing fingerboards that you don't want to salvage. It's quick, accurate, and easy to control. Much better than trying to remove the board and crack the neck.

A router has a smaller cutting area, requiring more time, and you would probably have to make some kind of jig... more time as well.
 
eh_train said:
Would a power hand planer be advisable, at least for the beginning stages of turning the old fingerboard into a shim???

Thanks in advance for any advice!

Paul O'Connell
Toronto

It would get you closer, but you would want to leave plenty of room to use a sharp block plane, etc. to finish up.

By the way, Bosch is the way to go.