I’ll give this a shot…
Guitar like-more of a ring to the note
Bass like- girthy fat and blossoming
I think I'm starting to get the idea.
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
I’ll give this a shot…
Guitar like-more of a ring to the note
Bass like- girthy fat and blossoming
I’ll give this a shot…
Guitar like-more of a ring to the note
Bass like- girthy fat and blossoming
Like I said, I will leave them on for a few weeks/months and see how they settle in.
The BN high G has actually more wrap layers. Than usual, that is.Might be the result of having less wrap layers.
Thank you for the lesson on semantics.The BN high G has actually more wrap layers. Than usual, that is.
I know, I read it the first time. You did not single out the E string as not having as much girth. Going by what you wrote, it might well have been the G, as well - in which case, I was just pointing out how the number of wraps is not lower but in fact higher than usual. You're very welcome.Thank you for the lesson on semantics.
What I wrote (post #477) “They just don’t have as much girth in tone. Might be the result of having less wrap layers.” in the context to what Jon Moody wrote, (post #54) “Aside from what was already mentioned, the D'A BT set still uses 1 cover for the G string and 3 covers for the E string, whereas the Balanced Nickels use 2 covers on all four strings. Different construction, not to mention materials that are different as well.”
To which you’ve just proven my point that your comment was made for no other reason than to argue with my opinion and fact.I know, I read it the first time. You did not single out the E string as not having as much girth. Going by what you wrote, it might well have been the G, as well - in which case, I was just pointing out how the number of wraps is not lower but in fact higher than usual. You're very welcome.![]()
I see you much proner to arguing than I am.To which you’ve just proven my point that your comment was made for no other reason than to argue with my opinion and fact.![]()
Have a nice day, manI see you much proner to arguing than I am.Your original post was ambiguous, and mine had the potential to be useful to both you and other posters.
I think GHS Balanced Nickels are likely one of the most bass-like roundwound bass strings out there. I don't remember having any quarrel with them when brand new, but yeah, probably worth playing them in a while longer, if you have time to do so.
Listen to play back of of recent gigs, My bass is more defined in the mix with Balanced nickels. The just sit well.
When I first put the 40-101 set on my P bass back in 2017, they didn't wow me at first. But I do have to agree with you; I loved the way they "sat in the mix" with clarity and definition without being too up-front.![]()
You can try the GHS Round Core Boomer .030, which can be ordered as a single as long as you don't mind having green silks for E-G and red silk on the high C.Hey everyone!
I was thinking of stringing my bass with GHS BN 40-101. Here's the catch, I have a 5-string bass, 33' scale, E-C tunning. Which string (single) would you think it would pair the best with this set for the high C?
Thanks!
The lows on the BN are deeper, while the NLR has a punchier low-mid presence. Otherwise, they're similar in their smooth midrange and a clear but non-zingy top end.Has anyone done a direct comparison of GHS Balanced Nickels and DR Nickel Lo Riders? I'm curious about that.
No, I haven't searched.
Excellent. Thank you for that.The lows on the BN are deeper, while the NLR has a punchier low-mid presence. Otherwise, they're similar in their smooth midrange and a clear but non-zingy top end.
Thanks!You can try the GHS Round Core Boomer .030, which can be ordered as a single as long as you don't mind having green silks for E-G and red silk on the high C.