Come to my hometown, Edinburgh. You won't regret it.Mackintosh was my design hero as young art student. Planning on going to Scotland next year, maybe Glasgow.
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
Come to my hometown, Edinburgh. You won't regret it.Mackintosh was my design hero as young art student. Planning on going to Scotland next year, maybe Glasgow.
I went down to London to get one of the first 4003 Blue Boys to hit these shores. Within a matter of months the finish took on a light green tint which niggled me, as the BB finish was what attracted me to the bass. Then it began to develop random, tobacco-like blotches. I highlighted this issue on the RIC forum and was immediately attacked by John Hall, who accused me of not keeping the bass clean, of not keeping it in its case (!!!), and of keeping it in direct sunlight, or under fluorescent lamps.Yeah, the UV cure clear had it's issues, mainly that UV light doesn't penetrate opaque finishes well, so it can be problematic (as Ric found out) for color coats, but the tech has matured to the point you can cure it at home in direct sunlight. It's toxic as hell unfortunately, like nearly all durable finishes, but it doesn't yellow. I'm going to experiment with Solarez UV cure resin for crushed mica sharkfin inlays on my 4005-ish build. That's one of the features I've always loved about the "deluxe" models, and it's surprisingly difficult to do well. The resin infill has to be water-clear and cure very hard, or it won't polish up well, or is easily scratched by the strings. I've never been able to find out what Ric used for the resin, bit of a trade secret, but I'm guessing some kind of polyester.
Ah, yes. The Muriel Gray Effect.......I wad born and raised there.
You'll like house for an art lover
The art school keeps burning down though
My 74 also had several of those.Then it began to develop random, tobacco-like blotches.
The BB got moved on pronto, before it ended up looking like the contents of a baccy pouch.
The zymol removed them, but it took quite a few applications.
I personally know two who did....(does anybody actually graduate from Berklee?)...
Yeah, it’s a get it , or not thing with Rics.Hmm, well, it’s a Ric.
Looks sound playability all mentioned.
You “get it” or you don’t.
As to the edges, there are models without the binding.
As to setups, they are unique and quirky, fiddly and frustrating, BUT they tend to be very stable.
The bridge is a problem if you need to Palm mute, but again there are models that employ more “standard” bridge designs, and ALSO come without binding.
They are a unique instrument family.
In a world dominated by F-style basses, they stand apart. The design is a stubbornly adhered to virtually unchanged since introduction, with only recently technical details changing.
Me channeling Cliff with one of his original bands Trauma.
View attachment 7338164

Mackintosh even "flirted" with Art Deco long before Art Deco was a thing, in the west entrance to the GSA.I always associate that font with Charles Rennie Mackintosh, so more Art Nouveau, no?
![]()
Here’s one for you.
That simply does not float my boat. Tedious. Each to their own, though.Huh? You don’t care for Monk tunes?
I don't know about "grim", but I think it's essential to approach most Monk tunes with lightness and a sense of play, and that particular arrangement is just heavy heavy and heavy. So slow. So heavy. If you play the tune more like Monk played it, the dissonances just add a nice flavor of spice to it instead of whacking you over the head.Jesus, that's grim....
Well, I think Monk would have loved that interpretation, as do I. Brilliant Corners is heavily dramatic, not light and playful, and Monk played it with as much darkness and force as he could with the instrumentation he had available.I don't know about "grim", but I think it's essential to approach most Monk tunes with lightness and a sense of play, and that particular arrangement is just heavy heavy and heavy. So slow. So heavy. If you play the tune more like Monk played it, the dissonances just add a nice flavor of spice to it instead of whacking you over the head.
Sorry, great musicians, but I don't dig it.