• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Rondo's business.

Is it really unethical to return a perfectly good bass? I ask as a serious question.

My local music stores do not carry all the gear I am interested in buying, and often times I do not get to try out the gear I want before I buy it. In these cases, I either have to pay a large deposit up front for the music store to order it, or just get it online myself. What if I don't like the product after I buy it; not because it is broken, but it just didn't sound or feel like I was expecting. Would it be wrong of me to take advantage of a manufacturers return policy to salvage what I can of my investment?

It's not unethical to return a perfectly good bass. But it's also not unethical for the store you bought it from to charge you for shipping and restocking.

You're basically renting a NEW bass and returning a USED one. The store takes a hit. The store cannot ethically resell it as new.
 
It's not unethical to return a perfectly good bass. But it's also not unethical for the store you bought it from to charge you for shipping and restocking.

You're basically renting a NEW bass and returning a USED one. The store takes a hit. The store cannot ethically resell it as new.

You, sir, stated this far more eloquently then any of us! Well done.
 
My point is he is not refunding the faulty bass' shipping either.. Did somebody not read that? Yes, I chose to return them both. However, he is not refunding the shipping on the bass with the loose neck pocket either. His reason was because one was good, I should have kept them both. So I should be stuck with the bad one?

How is everybody focusing on the acceptable bass to include Kurt Z?????? MY POINT IS THE FAULTY BASS!!!!!!! PER HIS RETURN POLICY, I SHOULD BE REFUNDED FOR THE SHIPPING OF THE ONE BASS WITH THE UNACCEPTABLE QUALITY. I understand I sent the 2nd bass back of my own accord.

You may want to consider editing your original post to make your position clearer.
 
You do realize the mark up on these basses is not much more than the cost to ship them, right? Kurt has to pay the bills just like anyone else. He can't just ship basses out for people to give a try, then pay for them to be returned.

Also, just how big was the gap in the neck pocket? In a $120 bass I wouldn't be expecting much in that department. They have to slap these together quickly and in high volume to sell at those prices. Unless it was a Grand Canyon kind of gap, I wouldn't call it a returnable flaw in a bass priced like the SX basses are.
 
tumblr_lxjm4n4umw1rn1xxfo1_400.gif
531864_o.gif
1919253_o.gif
 
Oh boy, here we go again. :rollno:

The $100 SX basses that I've gotten from Rondo are actually NOT crap. That's the cool thing.

I agree. I recently bought an Ursa2 5 string Jazz, and it is a very decent bass. Solidly built, good playing and good sounding (surprisingly good pickups, no reason to change them at all). And the CAR finish looks as good as the one on the Korean made Lakland Skyline JO4 I used to have which at the time was an $1100 bass. It even has quilting on the maple fingerboard. What more can you ask for in a $150 bass?
 
I agree. I recently bought an Ursa2 5 string Jazz, and it is a very decent bass. Solidly built, good playing and good sounding (surprisingly good pickups, no reason to change them at all). And the CAR finish looks as good as the one on the Korean made Lakland Skyline JO4 I used to have which at the time was an $1100 bass. It even has quilting on the maple fingerboard. What more can you ask for in a $150 bass?

I would ask for side LED's and an Aguilar preamp.