I don't believe them new-fangled internets have made it to his neck of the woods yet.Does he also have a YouTube channel where he professes his expertise as he reviews amps while he has his trusty toothless side kick hold his beer?
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
I don't believe them new-fangled internets have made it to his neck of the woods yet.Does he also have a YouTube channel where he professes his expertise as he reviews amps while he has his trusty toothless side kick hold his beer?
...yeah but my uncle's brother-in-law's neighbor had a friend that had a Rumble and he said the electronics were help together with scotch tape and half a bag of Big League Chew. I'm gonna go with that, rather than your statistical data, professional expertise, and industry "behind-the-scenes" insight.
The old Peaveys are built like tanks. Nothing is built like that today, not even Peaveys. Part of that is economics, but another part is experience, people like agedhorse actually tracking how things typically get damaged. I think it’s certainly fair to say that a $500 Rumble is intentionally built less stout than a $2,000 Mesa, but also fair to say that yours must have taken a freak hit at just the right angle, force and height for maximum damage, because others’ experiences show that generally, Fender did a pretty good job.From the external cosmetic damage it appears to be an impact that should not render the piece of gear not worth fixing. Some may disagree with that assessment (without even seeing it), and valid point has been raised that the impact may have been more severe than the visible damage let on. Even with that in mind, it is not the kind of thing that would render an older combo silent. By comparison to say, 80s Peavey, it might be considered quite fragile now, wouldn't it? Maybe not eggshell, I'll admit to hyperbole, but the result is still no less surprising on my end. You can throw a TKO down a flight of stairs and still plug and play. And then you'd have to fix your stairs.![]()
Here’s the difference between what I would do as an engineer with zero experience in amp design and what you do as an experienced amp engineer, because I’d decouple the exterior jack from my interior PCB. Thus I’d spend more manufacturing money and have additional fail points, and I’d be less competitive because I’m spending money fixing problems that statistically aren’t problems. (Different from Peavey where designing tanks was an informed design decision.)I have also seen (and designed) plenty of amps using (quality) PCB mounted 1/4" jacks with zero problems over tens of thousands of units. I actually looked at how many broken or damaged jacks and PCBs I have seen in the last ~10 years and there was exactly 1 damaged jack (input jack, amp fell off the cabinet with the bass plugged in) and zero damaged PCBs.
I track my own service data so that I know what's real and what's imagined. I know that Fender (and others) do the same, but sometimes damage happens for reasons beyond the manufacturer's control. Transporting a bass without a case in the back of a truck/van/SUVis unthinkable because of the potential damage, why not amps?
PCBs are not "brittle" or "fragile" if the designer chooses better quality materials. .062" FR-4 material, double sided with plated holes is amazingly robust. Traces do not have to be thin nor do pads have to be small of the designer prioritizes their layout for robustness.
A well designed, well laid out, well constructed PCB based amp is generally more reliable and robust than a hand wired amp, especially when built point to point. Not by a small margin either.
That goes both ways though. If it’s a cheap board, then sure it breaks more easily, but it’s also easier to repair and cheaper to replace.I question if it's FR4 in a Rumble.
Highly doubt it's a multi-layer
I haven't seen a PCB from a Fender amp for a while, but to keep costs down, it's more likely to be a single sided, paper based substrate
And start every video with “Here’s what the big amp manufacturers don’t want you to know.”Does he also have a YouTube channel where he professes his expertise as he reviews amps while he has his trusty toothless side kick hold his beer?
Here’s the difference between what I would do as an engineer with zero experience in amp design and what you do as an experienced amp engineer, because I’d decouple the exterior jack from my interior PCB. Thus I’d spend more manufacturing money and have additional fail points, and I’d be less competitive because I’m spending money fixing problems that statistically aren’t problems. (Different from Peavey where designing tanks was an informed design decision.)
I question if it's FR4 in a Rumble.
Highly doubt it's a multi-layer
I haven't seen a PCB from a Fender amp for a while, but to keep costs down, it's more likely to be a single sided, paper based substrate
... ... we all know these amps have a 5 year warranty. ... ... .
The legendary Fender 5-year transferable warranty is fading into history. As of January 1, 2017 the warranty is 2-year non-transferable. (sigh)
.

The legendary Fender 5-year transferable warranty is fading into history. As of January 1, 2017 the warranty is 2-year non-transferable. (sigh)
.
Oh Dang .. Never mind![]()
Here’s the difference between what I would do as an engineer with zero experience in amp design and what you do as an experienced amp engineer, because I’d decouple the exterior jack from my interior PCB. Thus I’d spend more manufacturing money and have additional fail points, and I’d be less competitive because I’m spending money fixing problems that statistically aren’t problems. (Different from Peavey where designing tanks was an informed design decision.)