I got it. 2003 in very mint condition. It's as if this thing was played once (maybe) and then sat in a case for years. It's in brand-new condition. $1800.
Website pic:
Website pic:
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
I got it. 2003 in very mint condition. It's as if this thing was played once (maybe) and then sat in a case for years. It's in brand-new condition. $1800.
Website pic:
View attachment 7269645
I mean, that's stunning. It may not be your thing and fair enough, but no reason why that couldn't be all the bass anyone would ever need.I got it. 2003 in very mint condition. It's as if this thing was played once (maybe) and then sat in a case for years. It's in brand-new condition. $1800.
Website pic:
View attachment 7269645

Extremely classic, cool looks! Congratulations.I got it. 2003 in very mint condition. It's as if this thing was played once (maybe) and then sat in a case for years. It's in brand-new condition. $1800.
Website pic:
View attachment 7269645
Single pickup IS the StingRay sound.
I've tried and owned alot of HH's over the years, to me they sound too scooped and uncharacteristic (unless you're only using the rear pickup, but then why get it?). To me that front pickup is too far forward, and it will never sound like a Sabre either, which was the HH done correctly IMO.
Loved my ATK305 for many years. Couple hundreds of gigs. Thousands of hours of playtime. Great bass.I would be more into your Blazer. That era of Ibanez is my Jam.
With that said, and knowing that you dont have an anti Ibanez tilt, I would consider a 90s Ibanez ATK 300.
They are sometimes called the 'poor man's Stingray'
If being a "poor man" means not having an ego regarding the writing on the headstock, then call me poor. I like the ATK more.