• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Short Scale, Low B, Acoustic Strings

Hi
I've just got myself a Short Scale (30") Acoustic Five String.
It had a set of roundwound strings on it that played OK, but I really don't get on with roundwound.

I managed to find a set of LaBella Short Scale Flat Wound strings (the only short scale 5 string flat sets I could find), but the B string is almost too loose to play.

The low B is a .128 (on both the light and medium sets) - and whilst it does tune to a B (just), it is noticeably looser than the other strings, and the tone is not as good.

I've read a load of articles on the web about stinrg gauge and tension - and I seem to have read a number of conflidting articles...

Would a thicker string give me a higher tension on the low B?
How much thicker would I need to go to see the difference? (.130, .135 ?)

As there are so few short scale 5 string flat sets available, I'd probably need to try a normal scale string - which would mean winding the main part of the string (not the covered end) onto the tuning peg. Many sites say this is a major issue - is there any way to do this safely / succesfully?

If anyone has any thoughts / suggestions I'd be very grateful.

Cheers,

Paul
 
You're right on both counts. A thicker gauge will give more tension, and a long scale string will be tough to wrap around the tuning post.

Sometimes, with roundwounds, I've seen people unwrap and then solder the strings to bring the taper back, but I don't know how that would work with flats.
 
Hi Paul,

Recently I started a tread in search of a shortscale flatwound low B.
In your post you kind of give the answer to my question: Apperently Labella does have two sets, a light and a medium.
Can you please give the exact name of the mediumset, so I can order one at my local shop?

For the answer of your questions: Yes, a .135 probaly will do better for you and as for shortening 34" strings: Mongo2 describes a good way in the "Who makes a 30" shortscale flatwound low B?" thread. Haven't tried it myself yet.