Mike, in the Q&A link I posted earlier from the Wash Post, the dude answering the questions explained why armed ships havn't been used in the past, and may not be in the future: Cost. Pure and simple, it's a better financial risk to take a chance and pay the ransom if the very small odds of getting attacked actually occur.
It will be interesting to see what happens now. I can't imagine a Naval response will become the new Operating Paradigm.
Gard: Earlier you implied that the US had paid off Pirates in the past. I hadn't heard that. Is that true?
It will be interesting to see what happens now. I can't imagine a Naval response will become the new Operating Paradigm.
Gard: Earlier you implied that the US had paid off Pirates in the past. I hadn't heard that. Is that true?

