Totally random thought / theoretical question.. (I have no idea if this is already an obvious technique or something that wouldn't work at all):
If you had a bass with, say, two outputs from magnetic and piezo pickups, then the piezo signal would be much more transient-heavy, right?
And if you sidechained the piezo so that the magnetic pickups are compressed more when piezo is louder, then the magnetic pickup mix would have less transient, right?
And if you just tossed the piezo channel or turned the volume down, would you then wind up with a signal where you have a different kind of control over the transient?
My stupid questions are basically: how stupid am I being?
Would this work like I'm imagining?
Would you expect this to be any functionally different from regular compression?
Would you expect it to give you any greater flexibility than what you might just get from other types of multiple or parallel compression?
Is this already an obvious technique that I just have never heard about?
If you had a bass with, say, two outputs from magnetic and piezo pickups, then the piezo signal would be much more transient-heavy, right?
And if you sidechained the piezo so that the magnetic pickups are compressed more when piezo is louder, then the magnetic pickup mix would have less transient, right?
And if you just tossed the piezo channel or turned the volume down, would you then wind up with a signal where you have a different kind of control over the transient?
My stupid questions are basically: how stupid am I being?
Would this work like I'm imagining?
Would you expect this to be any functionally different from regular compression?
Would you expect it to give you any greater flexibility than what you might just get from other types of multiple or parallel compression?
Is this already an obvious technique that I just have never heard about?